1974
DOI: 10.1002/jps.2600631021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progesterone Injection Assay by Liquid Chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…21 Other chromatographic parameters, such as capacity factor (k 0 ), resolution (R) tailing factor (T) and theoretical plate number (N), were also analyzed. [22][23][24][25] The capacity factor is a measure of where the peak of interest is located with respect to the void volume, i.e., corresponds to the elution time of the non-retained components. R is a measure of the degree of separation of two peaks.…”
Section: Methods Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 Other chromatographic parameters, such as capacity factor (k 0 ), resolution (R) tailing factor (T) and theoretical plate number (N), were also analyzed. [22][23][24][25] The capacity factor is a measure of where the peak of interest is located with respect to the void volume, i.e., corresponds to the elution time of the non-retained components. R is a measure of the degree of separation of two peaks.…”
Section: Methods Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All analytical chemists should know that if a response curve has an intercept significantly different from zero, proper provision in the calculation must be made. The conventional, and always correct techniques, whether the function is linear or nonlinear, are graphical interpolation from the plot (3)(4)(5) or the use of an algebraic equation of the function (6,7). These techniques can be quite sophisticated as illustrated in the work of Govindaraju, Mevelle, and Chouard (8) who use computer-stored calibration curves as second-degree polynominals with three regression coefficients for each curve, and in the work of Mitchell et al (1) who employ a multiple-curve procedure which uses a series of least-squares regression equations with confidence bands computed from the calibration data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wittmer and Haney ( 12) and Won et al (13) state correctly after having shown that the intercept value was insignificantly low, that these data "indicate that the liquid chromatographic method can be used with a single-point standard". Authors such as Sondack ( 14) who states that "the extrapolation results passed through the origin" and King et al (5) who conclude "a standard graph rather than a one-point standard is required for maximum accuracy in the procedure" are examples of those who clearly understand the requirement. Unfortunately, too often authors simply state that the response curve was linear but fail to report whether a significant intercept was found (15)(16)(17)(18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%