1994
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-6248.1994.00287.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profiling Preference for Employment in Family-Owned Firms

Abstract: This article summarizes findings from an exploratory investigation of factors related to preference for employment in family‐owned firms. The sample for the study consists of undergraduate and graduate students enrolled in business management classes. Discriminant analysis was used to identify life history and job characteristic variables that distinguish between groups of individuals who expressed a high and low preference for working in a family‐owned firm. Additional findings from the study are summarized, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Upton and Heck (1997) note such a possibility, citing the works of Astrachan (1988), Covin (1994), Davis and Stern (1980), and Harris, Martinez, and Ward (1994). The logic of family presence being linked to philanthropic behavior is straightforward; insofar as family and firm are two distinct entities with two distinct agenda for operation and performance assessment, we expect to observe differences in those firms with greater family presence compared to those with less or none.…”
Section: Extending Current Philanthropy Research: the Role Of Familymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Upton and Heck (1997) note such a possibility, citing the works of Astrachan (1988), Covin (1994), Davis and Stern (1980), and Harris, Martinez, and Ward (1994). The logic of family presence being linked to philanthropic behavior is straightforward; insofar as family and firm are two distinct entities with two distinct agenda for operation and performance assessment, we expect to observe differences in those firms with greater family presence compared to those with less or none.…”
Section: Extending Current Philanthropy Research: the Role Of Familymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, it is assumed that a stake in equity capital is a necessary requirement. From this perspective, family firms are defined as companies in which ownership belongs to one family or is distributed among several Innovation in family firms 267 families and their members, and in which (apart from the entrepreneur) at least one supplemental family member actively participates in the company through his or her collaboration (Covin 1999;Carsrud 2006;Rutherford et al 2006). The will to retain the company in the family on a long-term basis also should be added as a necessary prerequisite, along with the distribution of control among several family members (Sharma et al 1997;Astrachan and Shanker 2003).…”
Section: Family Firmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This plan is vital for business sustainability (LaChappelle 1997) because family members' business leadership is perceived to be parlous, as a source of conflict among family members (Finney 1999;Covin 1994;Handler 1990). To overcome this conflict, family constitutions that explain each family member's duties, responsibilities, and authority towards the business (Ankara Chamber of Industry 2005), co-leadership (Lansberg 1999), and the socialization of the future leader in the business environment (Garcia-Alvarez et al 2002;Iannarelli 1992) have been suggested.…”
Section: Leadership In Family Businessesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Family business literature emphasizes leadership for sustainability (LaChappelle 1997) and contends that the selection of an appropriate leader is also vital to avoid intra-family conflicts (Garcia-Alvarez et al 2002;Covin 1994). An important feature of family business leadership is its strong dependence on mutual trust between the leader and the family members to avoid conflict (Cater 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%