2016
DOI: 10.1590/0100-29452016142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Productivity, Fruit Physicochemical Quality and Distinctiveness of Passion Fruit Populations

Abstract: -The productivity and physicochemical quality evaluation is important, as it identifies superior populations. however, launching products requires following the descriptors according to DhE test instructions. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate three passion fruit populations with high productivity and physicochemical quality characteristics for commercial launch. The experiment was conducted at the State University of Mato Grosso experimental area, located in the municipality of Tangará da Serra, MT. The exper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the second cycle, the mass of fruits increased exponentially until the estimated proportion of 35%, because, probably, below this proportion the supply of nutrients, especially N and K, with reported effects on the variable in question (AULAR et al, 2014), was short of the demand of plant of passion fruit to express the limit of mass gain of fruits, which may have occurred due to the supplementary nitrogen fertilization have been residual and not present effect. With the same cultivar, Aguiar et al (2017) obtained fruits with mass of 325.7 g and Cavalcante et al (2016) with a mass of 257 g, interval that includes the values obtained in this study of 320 g, for the first cycle, and 318.4 g, for the second cycle.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the second cycle, the mass of fruits increased exponentially until the estimated proportion of 35%, because, probably, below this proportion the supply of nutrients, especially N and K, with reported effects on the variable in question (AULAR et al, 2014), was short of the demand of plant of passion fruit to express the limit of mass gain of fruits, which may have occurred due to the supplementary nitrogen fertilization have been residual and not present effect. With the same cultivar, Aguiar et al (2017) obtained fruits with mass of 325.7 g and Cavalcante et al (2016) with a mass of 257 g, interval that includes the values obtained in this study of 320 g, for the first cycle, and 318.4 g, for the second cycle.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The mineral and organic fertilization does not ns=non-significant, * and ** significant at 5% and 1% respectively Source: survey data. Cavalcante et al (2016) using the same cultivar obtained values of 84.2 and 99.6 mm, respectively, for the diameter and length. Just as occurred with the mass of fruits, the absence of response of chemical fertilization in the first cycle, to the diameters of the fruits, suggests that the worm compost applied during the first year of cultivation presented additional effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…On the present study, the only significant variation occurred in the fruits packed in 30μm HDPE maintained under ambient conditions (Table 2). Typicaly, the higher the Ratio, the more palatable will be the juice or the fruit pulp, since the soluble solids content is high and the acidity is low (Cavalcante et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phosphites K1, K2, Ca1 and Zn were the ones which reduced more the disease lesion size (Table 1). Some works were performed with phosphites of K and Ca (BRACKMANN et al, 2004;BRACKMANN et al, 2005;ANDREU;CALDIZ, 2006;BLUM et al, 2007;DUTRA et al, 2018), and, considering the results presented (Table 1), two experiments were carried out with dose variation of phosphites K2 (40%P 2 O 5 +20%K 2 O, 1.5mL.L -1 ) and Ca1 (30%P 2 O 5 +7%Ca, 3mL.L -1 ). Provided the average of tests, the doses of Ca1 and K2 reduced significantly the diameter of the lesion (Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%