2019
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1295/1/012041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production of Fish Feed from Soy Residue and Shrimp Waste using Tapioca as Binding Agent

Abstract: The most used fish feed in cultivation activities is commercial feed that spends most of total cultivation cost. One of the effort to solve this problem is providing homemade fish food. The pellet based on local waste raw materials can reduce dependency of commercial fish feed. One of the local wastes that can be used is soy residue and shrimp waste. Tapioca is used as a binding agent for fish pellet. The aim of the research was to study the effect of raw material composition and binding agent concentration on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The transformation of these residues into co-products with added value is vital to minimizing problems in production and achieving greater efficiency in processing (Beerli et al, 2004). Shrimp processing residues have been used for animal feed production, chitin extraction, carotenoid pigments, remediation of contaminated water, plant disease control, water stress and environmental impacts (Vieira et al, 2011;De Souza et al, 2015;Seabra et al, 2014;Núñez-Gómez et al, 2016;Ghini et al, 2006;Bezerra et al, 2017;Decker et al, 2016;Sumardiono and Siqhny, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transformation of these residues into co-products with added value is vital to minimizing problems in production and achieving greater efficiency in processing (Beerli et al, 2004). Shrimp processing residues have been used for animal feed production, chitin extraction, carotenoid pigments, remediation of contaminated water, plant disease control, water stress and environmental impacts (Vieira et al, 2011;De Souza et al, 2015;Seabra et al, 2014;Núñez-Gómez et al, 2016;Ghini et al, 2006;Bezerra et al, 2017;Decker et al, 2016;Sumardiono and Siqhny, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%