2019
DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2019.1605441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Product relatedness and economic diversification at the regional level in two emerging economies: Mexico and Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(1 reference statement)
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This path‐dependent conceptualization of regional diversification has so far largely drawn upon insights into industrialized countries in Europe and North America. This is why critical voices have begun to question whether related diversification provides a sound theoretical framework for explaining the massive process of productive change that several economies in the Global South have undergone (Alonso & Martín, 2019; He et al ., 2018; Zhu et al ., 2017). They emphasize the need to extend research beyond the existing strong focus on industrialized countries in Europe or North America in order to broaden our understanding of regional diversification in distinct settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This path‐dependent conceptualization of regional diversification has so far largely drawn upon insights into industrialized countries in Europe and North America. This is why critical voices have begun to question whether related diversification provides a sound theoretical framework for explaining the massive process of productive change that several economies in the Global South have undergone (Alonso & Martín, 2019; He et al ., 2018; Zhu et al ., 2017). They emphasize the need to extend research beyond the existing strong focus on industrialized countries in Europe or North America in order to broaden our understanding of regional diversification in distinct settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They emphasize the need to extend research beyond the existing strong focus on industrialized countries in Europe or North America in order to broaden our understanding of regional diversification in distinct settings. Recently, first endeavours have complemented insights gained from regional diversification processes in upper‐middle income and BRIC economies (Alonso & Martín, 2019; He et al ., 2018; Zhu et al ., 2017). However, according to the economic complexity ranking, between 2005 and 2015, the most substantial structural change took place especially in low‐income and lower‐middle income economies such as Cambodia, the Philippines, Uganda, Vietnam and Zambia, indicating an increasing diversification towards more complex products (The Growth Lab at Harvard University, n.d.).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2017), He et al. (2019), and Alonso and Martín (2019) find that spatial spillover between neighbor regions is a significant driving force for industrial evolution. In particular, with the rising economic complexity and increasing dependence of industrial evolution on the spatial network of collaboration, inter‐regional collective learning through regional interaction has become a major avenue for enhancing regional development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A vast body of evidence has generally confirmed that spatial spillover, an important opportunity window to promote the evolution of local industries, has a positive impact on regional development. Boschma et al (2017), He et al (2019), and Alonso and Martín (2019) find that spatial spillover between neighbor regions is a significant driving force for industrial evolution. In particular, with the rising economic complexity and increasing dependence of industrial evolution on the spatial network of collaboration, inter-regional collective learning through regional interaction has become a major avenue for enhancing regional development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the former refers to actors that establish new firms or to existing companies introducing new activities, the influence of system-level agency transcends the organizational borders of individual firms and transforms regional innovation systems (Hassink, Isaksen, and Trippl 2019). Moreover, scholars have suggested broadening the narrow focus of EEG beyond locally available assets (Trippl, Grillitsch, and Isaksen 2018;Alonso and Martín 2019). Binz, Truffer, and Coenen (2016, 174) propose an analytical framework that incorporates these claims and explicitly includes firm and nonfirm actors, resources other than knowledge, and the crucial role of extraregional assets to provide "more nuanced answers to the fundamental questions when (under what conditions) and how (through what kind of mechanisms) new industrial paths are created in regions."…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%