Producing ‘good enough’ automated transcripts securely: Extending Bokhove and Downey (2018) to address security concerns

Abstract

Interviews are an established research method across multiple disciplines. Such interviews are typically transcribed orthographically in order to facilitate analysis. Many novice qualitative researchers’ experiences of manual transcription are that it is tedious and time-consuming, although it is generally accepted within much of the literature that quality of analysis is improved through researchers performing this task themselves. This is despite the potential for the exhausting nature of bulk transcription to conversely have a negative impact upon quality. Other researchers have explored the use of automated methods to ease the task of transcription, more recently using cloud-computing services, but such services present challenges to ensuring confidentiality and privacy of data. In the field of cyber-security, these are particularly concerning; however, any researcher dealing with confidential participant speech should also be uneasy with third-party access to such data. As a result, researchers, particularly early-career researchers and students, may find themselves with no option other than manual transcription. This article presents a secure and effective alternative, building on prior work published in this journal, to present a method that significantly reduced, by more than half, interview transcription time for the researcher yet maintained security of audio data. It presents a comparison between this method and a fully manual method, drawing on data from 10 interviews conducted as part of my doctoral research. The method presented requires an investment in specific equipment which currently only supports the English language.

Disrupting evaluation? Emerging technologies and their implications for the evaluation industry

“…More or less automatable tasks such as interview transcriptions (Da Silva, 2021), translations, screening of documents, high‐level coding of texts are likely to be delivered by AI powered solutions (Leeuw, 2020).…”

Perspectives of Remote Volunteer Palliative Care Consultants During COVID: A Qualitative Study

“…The pilot interview was transcribed both manually and using OtterAI with comparable accuracy; OtterAI was utilized thereafter with a manual inspection to confirm accuracy. 20,21 During the interviews, participants were encouraged to think out loud while reflecting, and interviewers conducted member checks with participants to improve accuracy and validity. Concurrent note-taking was performed by a second member of the interview team.…”

Transcription and Qualitative Methods: Implications for Third Sector Research

“…While AI may offer a cheaper and quicker alternative to human transcription, these transcripts will need to be meticulously checked by the researcher to ensure accuracy, fill in missing details or edit for context and readability. Using cloud-based AI transcription services also raises potential ethical concerns about data protection and confidentiality (Da Silva, 2021). There are numerous subjective decisions made in the course of creating a transcription that AI is unable to process, such as where to include punctuation, which words to include or exclude (such as filler words, hesitations, etc.)…”