2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00107-004-0524-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Processing roughness of sanded wood surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
56
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
4
56
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The average values of surface roughness are given in Table 2. Among all roughness parameters considered in this work, Rk was the most representative for processing, with no errors introduced by wood anatomy (Gurau et al 2005). The highest value of 20.8 µm was found for alder samples sanded with 180 applied after 80 grit size.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The average values of surface roughness are given in Table 2. Among all roughness parameters considered in this work, Rk was the most representative for processing, with no errors introduced by wood anatomy (Gurau et al 2005). The highest value of 20.8 µm was found for alder samples sanded with 180 applied after 80 grit size.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The sampling length and measuring resolution were set with respect to the recommendations given in the literature for wood surfaces as 2.5 mm and 5 µm, respectively (Gurau et al 2005). The equipment software automatically applied a Gaussian data filter and the roughness profile was obtained (Fig.…”
Section: Surface Roughness Measurement Of the Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, if anatomy is not removed from the measured profile, the Rk parameter is a good approximation of the processing roughness (Westkämper and Riegel 1993;Gurau 2004;Sharif and Tan 2011). This parameter (Rk) measures the core roughness of a profile, and it should be sensitive to wood processing and surface heat treatment.…”
Section: Rvkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to visualize the results, the core roughness (processing roughness) was separated from the other surface irregularities by upper and respectively lower thresholds with a method described by Gurau et al (2005) to allow visual comparisons between milling conditions and wood treatment.…”
Section: Rvkmentioning
confidence: 99%