2021
DOI: 10.3390/s21175862
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Processing and Analysis of Long-Range Scans with an Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) in Combination with Nanopositioning and Nanomeasuring Technology for Defect Detection and Quality Control

Abstract: This paper deals with a planar nanopositioning and -measuring machine, the so-called nanofabrication machine (NFM-100), in combination with a mounted atomic force microscope (AFM). This planar machine has a circular moving range of 100 mm. Due to the possibility of detecting structures in the nanometre range with an atomic force microscope and the large range of motion of the NFM-100, structures can be analysed with high resolution and precision over large areas by combining the two systems, which was not poss… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(26 reference statements)
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimum of 20-30 samples per period may depend on the defects present in the data. Nevertheless, it seems quite consistent over two orders of magnitude of N. It also agrees with the study of scanning speed influence [41] where the profile length was kept fixed and N decreased with increasing scanning speed. The variance of results did not change much for more than 20 samples per period, but it started to increase sharply when less than 20 points were measured (one needs to combine tables 1 and 2 in [41] to compute N/P).…”
Section: Optimal Number Of Samples Per Periodsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The optimum of 20-30 samples per period may depend on the defects present in the data. Nevertheless, it seems quite consistent over two orders of magnitude of N. It also agrees with the study of scanning speed influence [41] where the profile length was kept fixed and N decreased with increasing scanning speed. The variance of results did not change much for more than 20 samples per period, but it started to increase sharply when less than 20 points were measured (one needs to combine tables 1 and 2 in [41] to compute N/P).…”
Section: Optimal Number Of Samples Per Periodsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…by evaluating the position of the profile at some height, interpolating or fitting the points near to this position to obtain the position more accurately. This is called the zero crossing method and is also often used [39,41,42]. To use only points related to a special feature and throw away the rest of the structure might be not very efficient, so the centre of gravity evaluated from whole structures can be used in order to include all of the data [11,35,[41][42][43].…”
Section: Direct Space Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations