In
this paper, utilization of Victorian brown coal in a drying–pyrolysis
process to make products is techno-economically assessed. The pyrolysis
process is coupled with the drying and briquette making processes
in order to improve the overall efficiency and quality of the products.
The pyrolysis process led to the production of char, liquid oil, and
hydrogen-rich noncondensable gases. A steady-state Aspen Plus simulation
model was developed that provides estimated mass and energy balances
for the overall system. The effect of a change in the heating mode
and heating medium of the dryer on the overall energy and overall
product yields was examined. Additionally, the effect of a change
in the pyrolysis gas composition and coal initial moisture was studied.
Results revealed that the rotary drum dryer with hot flue gas as a
heating medium showed the best performance in terms of the final yields
of the pyrolysis products and CO2 emission rate. In the
best case scenario, when hot flue gas is used directly in a rotary
drum dryer, approximately 55% of the total gas produced from the pyrolysis
process is needed to burn in a separate boiler to provide heat for
the whole system. The shorter residence time in the pyrolysis reactor
results in a lower calorific value gas with less hydrogen but more
CO2 produced, which in turn increases the consumption of
gas to be burnt to provide heat for the whole system. The wet coal
initial moisture is another important factor affecting the energy
required for the dryer and hence the total energy consumption. A coal
with a higher moisture content needs more coal gas to be burnt and
releases more CO2. The cash flow analysis indicated the
net present value (NPV) of $52.8 million for a plant with a capacity
of 70.6 t/h raw coal based on the first quarter of 2015 pricing, with
a internal rate of return of 25% and the payback period of 5.1 years
under the best case scenario.