1990
DOI: 10.3109/10242429008992047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Process for the Stereoselective Biotransformation of Acetoacetic Acid Esters Using Yeasts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For more detailed information, see Figures S10 and S11 To apply the developed droplet microfluidics-IMS system for the whole-cell catalysis by yeast cells, the reduction of EAA to EHB was chosen as an exemplary biotransformation (Figure 3). 73,74 Before coupling the nL-sized reaction vessels to IMS, the capability of the applied custom-built drift-tube instrument had to be tested to monitor the course of the reaction. Although the structures of the substrate and the product are very similar, direct infusion ESI-IMS measurements showed that both analytes can be distinguished and separated (Figure 3) with a peak-to-peak resolution of R p-p = 0.9 (R p-p = 1.18 (t d EHB − t d EAA )/(w 0.5 EHB + w 0.5 EAA ), with the analyte drift time t d and the peak width at half-maximum w 0.5 ).…”
Section: ■ Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more detailed information, see Figures S10 and S11 To apply the developed droplet microfluidics-IMS system for the whole-cell catalysis by yeast cells, the reduction of EAA to EHB was chosen as an exemplary biotransformation (Figure 3). 73,74 Before coupling the nL-sized reaction vessels to IMS, the capability of the applied custom-built drift-tube instrument had to be tested to monitor the course of the reaction. Although the structures of the substrate and the product are very similar, direct infusion ESI-IMS measurements showed that both analytes can be distinguished and separated (Figure 3) with a peak-to-peak resolution of R p-p = 0.9 (R p-p = 1.18 (t d EHB − t d EAA )/(w 0.5 EHB + w 0.5 EAA ), with the analyte drift time t d and the peak width at half-maximum w 0.5 ).…”
Section: ■ Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if such protocols are described in sufficient detail to be reproduced, quantitative understanding of the results and scaling-up is difficult because several process parameters change simultaneously. In only a few publications, optimization of the reduction of ethyl 3-oxobutanoate while controlling and measuring the most important param- eters has been reported (Kometani et al, 1993(Kometani et al, , 1994Rohner et al, 1990;Wipf et al, 1983). From these publications a useful protocol for controlled EOB addition, leading to high enantiomeric excess values of the product can be obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%