2012 4th Electronic System-Integration Technology Conference 2012
DOI: 10.1109/estc.2012.6542176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Process characterization of thin wafer debonding with thermoplastic materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such method usually involve perforated carrier in order to obtain acceptable process time.  Mechanical sliding of the wafer after melt of a thermoplastic material [4].  Laser release methods by degrading the adhesive layer itself or by employing light sensitive release layers [5].…”
Section: Common Thin Wafer Debonding Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such method usually involve perforated carrier in order to obtain acceptable process time.  Mechanical sliding of the wafer after melt of a thermoplastic material [4].  Laser release methods by degrading the adhesive layer itself or by employing light sensitive release layers [5].…”
Section: Common Thin Wafer Debonding Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After that, a back side passivation layer consisting of 500 nm low-temperature SiN was added and the Cu in TSVs was exposed and the RDL was added. 24) Finally, Cu or Cu=Sn bumps were added on the basis of a semi-additive process to the top or bottom wafers, respectively. All relevant process conditions are listed in Table I.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automated detachers can help in the process by avoiding mechanical bending of the 2D material layer/film, which minimizes consequent crack propagation and also improves peeling yields. IMEC, in its 300 mm via-middle approach, also reported the progress of temporary bonding solutions, starting from first-generation thin substrate demonstrations. Phommahaxay et al has demonstrated a few instances of laser-induced automated debonding with low forces. , Over the past few years, development in robotic-arm tools has resulted in several impressive self-consistent transfer modules. , Most recently, exemplary work by Mannix et al has established that the future of 2D transfer technology lies in automated/robotic systems . The main barrier to developing a highly compatible 2D transfer strategy is the FEOL and BEOL compatibility.…”
Section: D Transfer Modulesmentioning
confidence: 99%