2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Procedures for Damping Properties Determination in Metal Foams to Improve FEM Modeling

Abstract: The aim of this work is to review the available procedures suitable for the determination of damping parameters in literature and standards for porous and dense materials and to evaluate their applicability to metal foams.\ud \ud Preliminary experimental setup and characterization data obtained with the selected procedures are presented and compared with representative FEM models. The experimental dynamic measurement on a test structure is compared with the simulated ones in order to validate the chosen proced… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the 2nd frequencies output results have been shown varied responses that were particular for each test. The damping ratios for the 1st natural frequencies of all specimens were found to be more than three times of the results which are presented by Golleti et al [33] as well as Banhart [41], where the specimens (aluminium foams) have been shaped with the similar conditions to our work, clamped in the middle (similar to 500D) and at the end (290D) respectively. This seems to highlight a major sensitivity of steel foams over aluminium foams to solid intrusions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the 2nd frequencies output results have been shown varied responses that were particular for each test. The damping ratios for the 1st natural frequencies of all specimens were found to be more than three times of the results which are presented by Golleti et al [33] as well as Banhart [41], where the specimens (aluminium foams) have been shaped with the similar conditions to our work, clamped in the middle (similar to 500D) and at the end (290D) respectively. This seems to highlight a major sensitivity of steel foams over aluminium foams to solid intrusions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The mesh was formed by 1020 Elements (1900 Elements for the specimen 500D) and 756 nodes (1404 nodes for the specimen 500D) to have a relevant deformation control. Both harmonic and modal analyses were performed on the models, iteratively, to update and calibrate the values of the damping ratio [33,34]. This was done accordingly to the model updating procedure described in [35] and more recently applied in [36,37].…”
Section: Fe Modeling and Model Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most experimental cases, the half power bandwidth technique is used to identify damping coefficients. This technique belongs to the category of single degree-of-freedom (SDOF) methods, which are based on the one degree of freedom system, modeled by mass-springdamper system, but half power bandwidth method may be affected by not negligible errors, due to poor frequency resolution (see [3]). In the current research work, in order to avoid the abovementioned estimation errors, the circle fit method is used for the damping estimation [7].…”
Section: Experimental Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goletti et al [3] proposed an industrial-level experimental procedure to estimate material damping of metal foams, in terms of damping ratio parameter. Then, they replicated the test by a FEM model, in which the experimental damping ratio values were used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, dynamic problems, such as modal analysis [1,2], impact tests [3,4], and fatigue analyses [5,6], are quite sensitive to boundary conditions and material parameters. The most common causes of differences in model behavior may be constraint stiffness and structural damping [7,8]. Computational models are usually verified by correlating the results of numerical calculation and experimental measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%