Problems of adoption of solar power and subsequent switching behavior: an exploration in India

Abstract

Purpose The challenges and factors of household adoption and the use of alternative energy sources have been a point of discussion among researchers. The purpose of this study is to apply a variant of the unified theory of adoption and use of technology (i.e. UTAUT 2) to explore the effect of various constructs that influence technology adoption on the consumers’ intention to adopt (and use) solar power generators (SPG) at the household level and the subsequent switching behavior. Design/methodology/approach Based on survey data collected from six cities in India (n = 1,246), factor analysis and structural equation modeling are applied for data analysis and testing the study hypotheses. Findings The results of the structural equation model found UTAUT constructs performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence and hedonic to positively affect behavioral intentions to adopt SPG. However, facilitating conditions and perceived value was not found to affect behavioral intentions to adopt SPG. Behavioral intentions to adopt SPG was found to positively influence the switching behavior. Research limitations/implications The present study augments the domain of alternative energy usage behavior by applying the UTAUT 2 in the adoption of alternative energy sources (namely, solar) and subsequent switching behavior from traditional sources at the household level. Practical implications The findings from the present study will guide the marketers and policymakers on the consumer attitudinal and behavioral aspects of solar energy usage at the household level and subsequent switching behavior. Originality/value The present study is novel as it moves beyond household-level behavioral intention to use solar energy and includes the switching behavior to shift to solar power from traditional energy sources.

Do Perceived Risk, Perception of Self-Efficacy, and Openness to Technology Matter for Solar PV Adoption? An Application of the Extended Theory of Planned Behavior

“…Consumers can adopt solar PV if they can see the real advantages of using it over non-renewable resources. Similarly, a study conducted in India found that consumers are more receptive to adopting new technologies if they believe in the innovative benefits of technology [124]. Thus, in the early stages of its implementation, the Pakistani government must emphasize the advantages of solar PV, and consumers' confidence in solar PV will grow over time.…”

Factors influencing the adoption of renewable energy in India: supplementing technology-driven drivers and barriers with sustainable development goals

“…In the Indian context, multiple studies have been carried out on renewable adoption (Charles and Majid, 2020;Luthra et al, 2015;Mani and Dhingra, 2012), but such studies are perspective analyses in nature and have failed to carry out real-time primary based empirical research as carried out by this study. Kumar et al (2023) and Roy and Mohapatra (2022) have conducted empirical studies on India related to RE adoptions. However, the studies were limited to roof-top solar-based adoption and neglected other renewable alternatives like biofuel.…”

“…Kumar et al. (2023) and Roy and Mohapatra (2022) have conducted empirical studies on India related to RE adoptions. However, the studies were limited to roof-top solar-based adoption and neglected other renewable alternatives like biofuel.…”

India’s emerging fuel mix for 2050: actions and strategies to decarbonize the transport sector

“…Looking forward, the government has set out an optimistic agenda for all its people to access safe, reliable and renewable electricity and clean fuel for cooking and mobility (Sangroya et al , 2020). In terms of renewable energy implementation in the energy sector, solar energy holds an upper hand, but it lacks a similar foothold in the fuel market (Roy, 2021). Multiple fuel market reforms like deregulation of petrol and diesel prices have been introduced in the past (Dubash et al , 2018) to reduce fossil fuel subsidy and enable alternate fuel to compete with fossil fuels.…”