2005
DOI: 10.1080/00043125.2005.11651567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Problems Confronting Visual Culture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The trigger for the debate was, presumably, Arthur Efland’s article ‘The entwined nature of the aesthetic’ (2004), in which he challenged what he considered visual culture’s submission to the ‘leveling tendency’ (Efland , 241) that pervades postmodern discourse. Efland (, 38) was deeply concerned that visual culture theory/practice, enabled by scholars like Bourdieu and Danto, removed intrinsic differences and legitimate hierarchy distinguishing fine art from popular visual culture objects, by representing the value attributed to both as totally socially constructed, culturally subjective and arbitrary. The ‘villain’ creating arbitrary hierarchy was modernist formalism, which required Kantian disinterestedness to work, which connoisseurs ostensibly possessed.…”
Section: Represent’n’ Representation and Aestheticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The trigger for the debate was, presumably, Arthur Efland’s article ‘The entwined nature of the aesthetic’ (2004), in which he challenged what he considered visual culture’s submission to the ‘leveling tendency’ (Efland , 241) that pervades postmodern discourse. Efland (, 38) was deeply concerned that visual culture theory/practice, enabled by scholars like Bourdieu and Danto, removed intrinsic differences and legitimate hierarchy distinguishing fine art from popular visual culture objects, by representing the value attributed to both as totally socially constructed, culturally subjective and arbitrary. The ‘villain’ creating arbitrary hierarchy was modernist formalism, which required Kantian disinterestedness to work, which connoisseurs ostensibly possessed.…”
Section: Represent’n’ Representation and Aestheticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efland had to concede that formalism, as generally understood, disconnected art from social life, and that social life supplied all of art’s meaning. Relying on Paul Guyer’s (1996) reinterpretation of Kant’s concept of disinterestedness, Efland () argued that disinterestedness was misunderstood by modernist formalism to mean
without any interest in the content of the world. However, disinterestedness in Kantian theory had a purpose – to provide an experience of freedom that could serve broader social purposes if, and only if, the arts were autonomous, that is, if in human cognition a space is provided for imagination and understanding to explore freely social or moral ideas without immediate social or political repercussions .
…”
Section: Represent’n’ Representation and Aestheticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contemporary US child culture, for example, Dyson (2003) found that children engaged in 'sampling', including themes from popular art and media. Like Efland's (2005) notions about visual culture, this suggests that educative arts experiences include both images of viewer's everyday lives and fine art images that transcend the everyday, and that the juxtaposition of the two results in heightened perception.…”
Section: Period Eyes: Utilizing Interpretive Lensesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Just what conception should we be encouraging? (p. 35) Efland (2005) suggested that visual cultural study include both the arts of everyday life and fine arts. 'Sometimes art is not obviously concerned with the everyday.…”
Section: School Art As a Cultural Sensibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%