2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2009.09.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Problems and potential of OSL dating Weichselian and Holocene sediments in Sweden

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
66
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
7
66
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is demonstrated by this volume which contains new results from OSL dating studies from Sweden (Alexanderson and Murray, 2012) Alexanderson and Murray, 2012). It must be stressed that different dating methods date different processes in landscape development, as shown by Lüthgens and Böse (2012) in their analysis of OSL and surface exposure dating of the glaciogenic landscapes around Berlin.…”
Section: Osl Dating Of Glacial Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is demonstrated by this volume which contains new results from OSL dating studies from Sweden (Alexanderson and Murray, 2012) Alexanderson and Murray, 2012). It must be stressed that different dating methods date different processes in landscape development, as shown by Lüthgens and Böse (2012) in their analysis of OSL and surface exposure dating of the glaciogenic landscapes around Berlin.…”
Section: Osl Dating Of Glacial Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The issue of morphostratigraphy is also considered systematically in a separate paper on this development of this topic with regard to the interpretation of the glacial history of northern Germany. Alexanderson and Murray (2012) present the results of an experiment to determine why, in many cases the OSL determinations produce results that do not accord (usually over-estimate) with the age expected from other, independent methods such as relationship with radiocarbon ages, cosmogenic radionuclide ages and glaciological principles applied to the location and stratigraphic context of the sediments. The experiment is based on a large number of ages taken from a wide range of relevant environments across Sweden, with a number of other determinations from other contexts to provide calibration.…”
Section: Brief Review Of the Content Of The Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alexanderson and Murray, 2012a;Johnsen et al, 2012), although they typically contain ages that overestimate the expected age range, presumably due to incomplete bleaching. Several recent studies have investigated the luminescence properties of quartz and feldspar from modern depositional environments, thereby testing the significance of incomplete bleaching in different glacial settings (Alexanderson, 2007;Alexanderson and Murray, 2012b). Alexanderson and Murray (2012b) showed that the risk for incompletely bleached grains is largest in subglacial till and proximal glaciofluvial sediment, and least in distal glaciofluvial and lacustrine sediment.…”
Section: Luminescence Datingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the amount of light emitted for a fixed radiation dose varies from one sample to another, and among aliquots of the same sample. This variation in sensitivity among samples is the result of different source rocks and sedimentary histories (Preusser et al 2006, Pietsch et al 2008, Alexanderson and Murray 2009, Zheng et al 2009, Fitzsimmons et al 2010. Thus, there is not a general relationship between the luminescence intensity and the radiation dose, i.e.…”
Section: Measurement Of Equivalent-dosementioning
confidence: 99%