. (2014) 'A model of Greenland ice sheet deglaciation constrained by observations of relative sea level and ice extent.', Quaternary science reviews., 102 . pp. 54-84. Further information on publisher's website:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2014.07.018Publisher's copyright statement: NOTICE: this is the author's version of a work that was accepted for publication in Quaternary Science Reviews. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A denitive version was subsequently published in Quaternary Science Reviews, 102, 2014Reviews, 102, , 10.1016Reviews, 102, /j.quascirev.2014 Additional information: Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. ABSTRACT An ice sheet model was constrained to reconstruct the evolution of the Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) from the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) to present to improve our understanding of its response to climate change. The study involved applying a glaciological model in series with a glacial isostatic adjustment and relative sea-level (RSL) model. The model reconstruction builds upon the work of Simpson et al. (2009) through four main extensions: (1) a larger constraint database consisting of RSL and ice extent data; model improvements to the (2) climate and (3) sea-level forcing components; (4) accounting for uncertainties in non-Greenland ice. The research was conducted primarily to address datamodel misfits and to quantify inherent model uncertainties with the Earth structure and non-Greenland ice. Our new model (termed Huy3) fits the majority of observations and is characterised by a number of defining features. During the LGM, the ice sheet had an excess of 4.7 m ice-equivalent sea-level (IESL), which reached a maximum volume of 5.1 m IESL at 16.5 cal. ka BP. Modelled retreat of ice from the continental shelf progressed at different rates and timings in different sectors. Southwest and Southeast Greenland began to retreat from the continental shelf by ~16 to 14 cal. ka BP, thus responding in part to the Bølling-Allerød warm event (c. 14.5 cal. ka BP); subsequently ice at the southern tip of Greenland readvanced during the Younger Dryas cold event. In northern Greenland the ice retreated rapidly from the continental shelf upon the climatic recovery out of the Younger Dryas to present-day conditions. Upon entering the Holocene (11.7 cal. ka BP)...
hltonD eFF nd wrgoldD wF nd tokesD gFF nd rsovD vF nd hykeD eFF nd edmsD FF nd ellrdD F nd erendsD rFiF nd etkinsonD xF nd ettigD tF nd frnettD FtF nd frnettD FvF nd fttersonD wF nd fernthezD F nd forns trD rFF nd frekenridgeD eF nd frinerD tFF nd frourdD iF nd gmpellD tFiF nd grlsonD eFiF nd glgueD tFtF nd gurryD fFfF nd higneultD FeF nd hu¡ eEvouertD rF nd isterrookD hFtF nd prnziD hFeF nd priedrihD rFqF nd punderD F nd quthierD wFF nd qownD eFF nd rrrisD uFvF nd r¡ etuD fF nd rooyerD FF nd tenningsD gFiF nd tohnsonD wFhF nd uehewD eFiF nd uelleyD FiF nd uerrD hF nd uingD iFvF nd ujeldsenD uFuF nd uneleD eFF nd vjeunesseD F nd vkemnD FF nd vmotheD wF nd vrsonD F nd vvoieD wF nd voopeD rFwF nd vowellD FF nd vusrdiD fFeF nd wnzD vF nd wwrtinD sF nd xixonD pFgF nd yhiettiD F nd rkhillD wFeF nd iperD hFtFF nd ronkD eFqF nd ihrdD FtFrF nd idgeD tFgF nd ossD wF nd oyD wF nd emnD eF nd hwD tF nd teD FF nd ellerD tFF nd hompsonD FfF nd horleifsonD rFvF nd ttingD hFtF nd eilletteD tFtF nd rdD fFgF nd eddleD FuF nd right trD rFiF @PHPHA 9en updted rdioronEsed ie mrgin hronology for the lst deglition of the xorth emerin se heet gomplexF9D uternry siene reviewsFD PQR F pF IHTPPQF
The last deglaciation was abruptly interrupted by a millennial-scale reversal to glacial conditions, the Younger Dryas cold event. This cold interval has been connected to a decrease in the rate of North Atlantic Deep Water formation and to a resulting weakening of the meridional overturning circulation owing to surface water freshening. In contrast, an earlier input of fresh water (meltwater pulse 1a), whose origin is disputed, apparently did not lead to a reduction of the meridional overturning circulation. Here we analyse an ensemble of simulations of the drainage chronology of the North American ice sheet in order to identify the geographical release points of freshwater forcing during deglaciation. According to the simulations with our calibrated glacial systems model, the North American ice sheet contributed about half the fresh water of meltwater pulse 1a. During the onset of the Younger Dryas, we find that the largest combined meltwater/iceberg discharge was directed into the Arctic Ocean. Given that the only drainage outlet from the Arctic Ocean was via the Fram Strait into the Greenland-Iceland-Norwegian seas, where North Atlantic Deep Water is formed today, we hypothesize that it was this Arctic freshwater flux that triggered the Younger Dryas cold reversal.
ABSTRACT. This paper discusses results from the second phase of the European Ice Sheet Modelling Initiative (EISMINT). It reports the intercomparison of ten operational ice-sheet models and uses a series of experiments to examine the implications of thermomechanical coupling for model behaviour. A schematic, circular ice sheet is used in the work which investigates both steady states and the response to stepped changes in climate. The major finding is that the radial symmetry implied in the experimental design can, under certain circumstances, break down with the formation of distinct, regularly spaced spokes of cold ice which extended from the interior of the ice sheet outward to the surrounding zone of basal melt.These features also manifest themselves in the thickness and velocity distributions predicted by the models. They appear to be a common feature to all of the models which took part in the intercomparison, and may stem from interactions between ice temperature, flow and surface form. The exact nature of these features varies between models, and their existence appears to be controlled by the overall thermal regime of the ice sheet. A second result is that there is considerable agreement between the models in their predictions of global-scale response to imposed climate change.
Summary Space–time reconstructions of the continental ice‐sheets that existed at Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) have previously been produced using two entirely independent methodologies. One based upon the use of theoretical models of ice‐sheet accumulation and flow and one based upon the geophysical inversion of relative sea level (RSL) histories from previously ice‐covered regions. The analyses described in this paper demonstrate the significant advantages that derive from the simultaneous application of both methods to the particular case of Greenland. We thereby show that the ICE‐4G reconstruction of the glaciation history of this region from LGM to present, which was based upon the geophysical inversion of RSL data alone, was reasonably accurate in the peripheral regions where RSL data were available but inaccurate in the interior of the ice‐sheet, which was unconstrained by such information. We test the new model of Greenland glacial history determined by the simultaneous application of the constraints that derive from ice‐sheet modelling and the geophysical inversion of RSL data by employing recently published geodetic inferences of mass‐balance over the entire interior region of the ice sheet and of GPS measurements of vertical crustal motion. These observations, which were not employed to constrain the ice‐sheet reconstruction, provide significant support for the new glacial history for Greenland that our analyses have led us to infer.
Abstract. The Last Glacial Maximum (LGM, 21 000 years ago) is one of the suite of paleoclimate simulations included in the current phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). It is an interval when insolation was similar to the present, but global ice volume was at a maximum, eustatic sea level was at or close to a minimum, greenhouse gas concentrations were lower, atmospheric aerosol loadings were higher than today, and vegetation and landsurface characteristics were different from today. The LGM has been a focus for the Paleoclimate Modelling Intercomparison Project (PMIP) since its inception, and thus many of the problems that might be associated with simulating such a radically different climate are well documented. TheLGM state provides an ideal case study for evaluating climate model performance because the changes in forcing and temperature between the LGM and pre-industrial are of the same order of magnitude as those projected for the end of the 21st century. Thus, the CMIP6 LGM experiment could provide additional information that can be used to constrain estimates of climate sensitivity. The design of the Tier 1 LGM experiment (lgm) includes an assessment of uncertainties in boundary conditions, in particular through the use of different reconstructions of the ice sheets and of the change in dust forcing. Additional (Tier 2) sensitivity experiments have been designed to quantify feedbacks associated with landsurface changes and aerosol loadings, and to isolate the role of individual forcings. Model analysis and evaluation will capitalize on the relative abundance of paleoenvironmental observations and quantitative climate reconstructions already available for the LGM.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.