2004
DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000120181.89206.54
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pro- And Anti-Cancer Effects of Immunosuppressive Agents Used in Organ Transplantation

Abstract: Development of cancer is a feared, and increasingly apparent, complication of long-term immunosuppressive therapy in transplant recipients. In addition to the need to reduce cancer occurrence in these patients, therapeutic protocols are lacking to simultaneously attack the malignancy and protect the allograft when neoplasms do occur. In this overview, we present the current literature regarding the pro- and anti-neoplastic effects of immunosuppressive agents on cancer growth and development. Recent experimenta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
218
1
7

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 315 publications
(230 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(57 reference statements)
4
218
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been reported that the effective doses of RAPA for immunosuppression coincide with doses required for its antiangiogenic effects (6). This allows RAPA to be considered for the effective treatment of organ rejection, autoimmune diseases, and cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been reported that the effective doses of RAPA for immunosuppression coincide with doses required for its antiangiogenic effects (6). This allows RAPA to be considered for the effective treatment of organ rejection, autoimmune diseases, and cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for the high incidence of cancer in these individuals, including patients with organ transplant, are unknown, but have been postulated to include impaired immune surveillance, viral infections, or the direct effects of immunosuppressive agents (2,4,5). Nevertheless, some clues to the mechanisms underlying the development of posttransplantation cancer have recently emerged from clinical findings, including the observation that transplant patients receiving the mTOR 2 inhibitor rapamycin (RAPA) do not develop cancer at the same rate as those receiving other immunosuppressive agents such as calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) (5)(6)(7)(8)(9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, rapamycin is shown to repress HIF-1␣ synthesis and expression of HIF-1 target genes including VEGF in these cells via targeting mTOR. Therefore, rapamycin is now considered to act as an antineoplastic agent, as well as an immunosuppressant (18,34). It appears to be obvious to hypothesize that rapamycin suppresses HIF-1␣ protein expression in T cells as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rapamycin binds to FK506-binding protein 12, and this complex targets mTOR and inhibits T cell response to IL-2 to progress G 1 to S phase (17). On the other hand, it has been noticed that rapamycin suppresses the growth of certain tumors (18,19). For example, rapamycin inhibits metastatic tumor growth and angiogenesis in mouse model and this anti-angiogenic activity is shown to link to a decrease in production of VEGF (20).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, mTORIs also inhibit the translation of transcription factors resulting in reduced angiogenesis, preventing the multiprotein complexes (mTORC1 and mTORC2) pathway activation, thereby halting cell proliferation, particularly in the setting of cancer development (Guba et al 2004). MTORi have antineoplastic properties, and show promise in reducing cancer recurrence while permitting ongoing immunosuppression (Law 2005).…”
Section: The Role Of Components Of the Immunosuppressive Regimenmentioning
confidence: 99%