BackgroundWe investigated whether sirolimus-based immunosuppression improves outcomes in liver transplantation (LTx) candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).MethodsIn a prospective-randomized open-label international trial, 525 LTx recipients with HCC initially receiving mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor–free immunosuppression were randomized 4 to 6 weeks after transplantation into a group on mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor–free immunosuppression (group A: 264 patients) or a group incorporating sirolimus (group B: 261). The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS); intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis was conducted after 8 years. Overall survival (OS) was a secondary endpoint.ResultsRecurrence-free survival was 64.5% in group A and 70.2% in group B at study end, this difference was not significant (P = 0.28; hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.62; 1.15). In a planned analysis of RFS rates at yearly intervals, group B showed better outcomes 3 years after transplantation (HR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.48-1.00). Similarly, OS (P = 0.21; HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.58-1.13) was not statistically better in group B at study end, but yearly analyses showed improvement out to 5 years (HR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.49-1.00). Interestingly, subgroup (Milan Criteria-based) analyses revealed that low-risk, rather than high-risk, patients benefited most from sirolimus; furthermore, younger recipients (age ≤60) also benefited, as well sirolimus monotherapy patients. Serious adverse event numbers were alike in groups A (860) and B (874).ConclusionsSirolimus in LTx recipients with HCC does not improve long-term RFS beyond 5 years. However, a RFS and OS benefit is evident in the first 3 to 5 years, especially in low-risk patients. This trial provides the first high-level evidence base for selecting immunosuppression in LTx recipients with HCC.

Peri-operative SARS-CoV-2 infection increases postoperative mortality. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal duration of planned delay before surgery in patients who have had SARS-CoV-2 infection. This international, multicentre, prospective cohort study included patients undergoing elective or emergency surgery during October 2020. Surgical patients with pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 infection were compared with those without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. The primary outcome measure was 30-day postoperative mortality. Logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted 30-day mortality rates stratified by time from diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection to surgery. Among 140,231 patients (116 countries), 3127 patients (2.2%) had a pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. Adjusted 30-day mortality in patients without SARS-CoV-2 infection was 1.5% (95%CI 1.4-1.5). In patients with a pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis, mortality was increased in patients having surgery within 0-2 weeks, 3-4 weeks and 5-6 weeks of the diagnosis (odds ratio (95%CI) 4.1 (3.3-4.8), 3.9 (2.6-5.1) and 3.6 (2.0-5.2), respectively). Surgery performed ≥ 7 weeks after SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis was associated with a similar mortality risk to baseline (odds ratio (95%CI) 1.5 (0.9-2.1)). After a ≥ 7 week delay in undertaking surgery following SARS-CoV-2 infection, patients with ongoing symptoms had a higher mortality than patients whose symptoms had resolved or who had been asymptomatic (6.0% (95%CI 3.2-8.7) vs. 2.4% (95%CI 1.4-3.4) vs. 1.3% (95%CI 0.6-2.0), respectively). Where possible, surgery should be delayed for at least 7 weeks following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients with ongoing symptoms ≥ 7 weeks from diagnosis may benefit from further delay.

Development of cancer is a feared, and increasingly apparent, complication of long-term immunosuppressive therapy in transplant recipients. In addition to the need to reduce cancer occurrence in these patients, therapeutic protocols are lacking to simultaneously attack the malignancy and protect the allograft when neoplasms do occur. In this overview, we present the current literature regarding the pro- and anti-neoplastic effects of immunosuppressive agents on cancer growth and development. Recent experimental findings are paving the way for new therapeutic strategies aimed at both protecting an allograft from immunologic rejection and addressing the problem of cancer in this high-risk population.

After decades of successful organ transplantation clinicians continue to be troubled by the increasing incidence of cancers under maintenance immunosuppression. In this study, we examined rates of malignancies in 2419 renal transplant recipients transplanted in our institution between 1978 and 2005. In renal transplant recipients the cumulative incidence of cancer after 25 years was 49.3% for all tumors and 39.7% excluding non-melanoma skin cancers, compared with 21% for a normal sex- and age-matched population. The most frequent tumors observed were non-melanoma skin cancers (20.5%), kidney cancers (12.0%), and cancers of the pharynx, larynx, or oral cavity (8.2%). The general increase of cancer risk was 4.3-fold. Independent risk factors for the development of a tumor were male gender, older recipient age, the presence of preformed antibodies before transplantation, and the time on immunosuppression. Interestingly, the use of IL-2-receptor antagonists significantly reduced the tumor risk of transplant recipients. The tumor risk between immunosuppressive drugs typically used for maintenance immunosuppression was not significantly different. However, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor-based immunosuppressive protocols showed a clear tendency for lower malignancy rates. De novo malignancies following renal transplantation represent a serious problem endangering the prognosis of otherwise successfully transplanted patients. Future studies will have to address whether optimized immunosuppressive regimens including mTOR-inhibitors are capable of reducing the incidence or preventing the development of posttransplant malignancies.

Lymphatic complications are common side effects of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor-based immunosuppression in kidney transplantation. Therefore, we investigated whether the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin, besides its known antihemangiogenic effect, also impedes regenerative lymphangiogenesis. In a murine skin flap model, rapamycin impaired recovery of lymphatic flow across surgical incisions resulting in prolonged wound edema in these animals. Importantly, the antilymphangiogenic effect of rapamycin was not related to a general inhibition of wound healing as demonstrated an in vivo Matrigeltrade mark lymphangiogenesis assay and a model of lymphangioma. Rapamycin concentrations as low as 1 ng/ml potently inhibited vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-C driven proliferation and migration, respectively, of isolated human lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) in vitro. Mechanistically, mTOR inhibition impairs downstream signaling of VEGF-A as well as VEGF-C via mTOR to the p70S6 kinase in LECs. In conclusion, we provide extensive experimental evidence for an antilymphangiogenic activity of mTOR inhibition suggesting that the early use of mTOR inhibitor following tissue injury should be avoided. Conversely, the antilymphangiogenic properties of rapamycin and its derivates may provide therapeutic value for the prevention and treatment of malignancies, respectively.