2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2005.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Privatization, corporatization, ownership forms and their effects on the performance of the world's major airports

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
116
1
17

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
14
116
1
17
Order By: Relevance
“…These superior qualitative differences give rise to higher rates for integrated services [16]. Over shorter distances, air transport faces stiff competition from surface modes and from combined road and sea services.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These superior qualitative differences give rise to higher rates for integrated services [16]. Over shorter distances, air transport faces stiff competition from surface modes and from combined road and sea services.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research shows that airport characteristics (hub status, traffic structure, outsourcing policies, regulatory procedures, ownership structure) may all contribute to airport efficiency [53]. Regarding the econometric approach to the second stage (i.e., after estimating efficiency), past airport studies have employed simple ordinary least squares, Tobit regressions and truncated regressions [30].…”
Section: Studies On the Determinants Of Airport Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (admittedly overly) general terms, before the mid-1980s airports tended to be government-owned, and primarily (or merely) seen as "logistic medium" to serve regional and/or macroeconomic development. From the mid-1980s on, however, the neoliberal 'logic' of privatization and commercialization has forced airports to function as "multipoint serviceprovider firms" 1 (Jarach, 2001) which focus on maximizing profitability by improving productive efficiency and competitiveness (Oum et al, 2006). Although this shift has been varied in its concrete operationalization, and has unfolded very unevenly in space and time, it seems fair to state that this is an overarching shift that has led airports to get more proactively involved as an actor in the air transport business by seeking interactions with the other key participants or 'actors' in air transport networks: carriers, passengers and other airports.…”
Section: Air Transport Network As 'Social Network'?mentioning
confidence: 99%