2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.06.29.20142596
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prior infection by seasonal coronaviruses does not prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection and associated Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in children

Abstract: Background: Children have a lower rate of COVID-19, potentially related to cross-protective immunity conferred by seasonal coronaviruses (HCoVs). We tested if prior infections with seasonal coronaviruses impacted SARS-CoV-2 infections and related Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome (MIS). Methods: This cross-sectional observational study in Paris hospitals enrolled 739 pauci or asymptomatic children (HOS group) plus 36 children with suspected MIS (MIS group). Prevalence, antigen specificity and neutralizing capa… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings suggest past infection with seasonal coronavirus, and thus by inference cross-reactive memory T cell immune response to SARS-CoV-2, do not provide protective immunity against subsequent infection with SARS-CoV-2 infection and also do not modulate the severity of COVID-19 in those that get infected by SARS-CoV-2. Our findings are consistent with the lack of protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection in children with prior infection with seasonal coronavirus based on seropositivity ( Sermet et al, 2020 ). Retrospective studies with larger number of participants and prospective studies in individuals with pre-existing cross-reactive memory T cells are needed to confirm lack of protective immunity to SARS-CoV-2 or modulation of COVID-19 severity in individuals with pre-existing cross-reactive T cells to seasonal coronaviruses.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Our findings suggest past infection with seasonal coronavirus, and thus by inference cross-reactive memory T cell immune response to SARS-CoV-2, do not provide protective immunity against subsequent infection with SARS-CoV-2 infection and also do not modulate the severity of COVID-19 in those that get infected by SARS-CoV-2. Our findings are consistent with the lack of protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection in children with prior infection with seasonal coronavirus based on seropositivity ( Sermet et al, 2020 ). Retrospective studies with larger number of participants and prospective studies in individuals with pre-existing cross-reactive memory T cells are needed to confirm lack of protective immunity to SARS-CoV-2 or modulation of COVID-19 severity in individuals with pre-existing cross-reactive T cells to seasonal coronaviruses.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Our findings suggest past infection with seasonal coronavirus, and thus by inference cross-reactive memory T cell immune response to SARS-CoV-2, do not provide protective immunity against subsequent infection with SARS-CoV-2 infection and also do not modulate the severity of COVID-19 in those that get infected by SARS-CoV-2. Our findings are consistent with the lack of protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection in children with prior infection with seasonal coronavirus based on seropositivity (7). Retrospective studies with larger number of participants and prospective studies in individuals with pre-existing cross-All rights reserved.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…However, whether these T cells can prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection or protect against severe disease remains to be determined 7 . Preliminary reports of surveys in children show no correlation between past infections with seasonal coronaviruses and susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection 8 . Clearly, no sterilizing immunity through cross-protection was evident during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak on the Charles de Gaulle aircraft carrier, where 70% of the young adult sailors became infected before the epidemic came to a halt 9 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%