2013
DOI: 10.1021/am403585n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Printed Indium Gallium Zinc Oxide Transistors. Self-Assembled Nanodielectric Effects on Low-Temperature Combustion Growth and Carrier Mobility

Abstract: Solution-processed amorphous oxide semiconductors (AOSs) are emerging as important electronic materials for displays and transparent electronics. We report here on the fabrication, microstructure, and performance characteristics of inkjet-printed, low-temperature combustion-processed, amorphous indium gallium zinc oxide (a-IGZO) thin-film transistors (TFTs) grown on solution-processed hafnia self-assembled nanodielectrics (Hf-SANDs). TFT performance for devices processed below 300 °C includes >4× enhancement i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
93
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
3
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The IGZO ink was prepared by previously described methods. 18 In brief, hydrated nitrate salts of In, Ga, and Zn were dissolved individually at a concentration of 0.0125 M in 2-methoxyethanol. Acetylacetone (50 µL per 10 mL solution) and ammonium hydroxide (aqueous, 14.5 M, 27.5 µL per 10 mL solution) were added following salt dissolution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IGZO ink was prepared by previously described methods. 18 In brief, hydrated nitrate salts of In, Ga, and Zn were dissolved individually at a concentration of 0.0125 M in 2-methoxyethanol. Acetylacetone (50 µL per 10 mL solution) and ammonium hydroxide (aqueous, 14.5 M, 27.5 µL per 10 mL solution) were added following salt dissolution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,27,29 While substantial work has been devoted to making thinner materials, only a few studies have focused on rationally increasing the dielectric constant. 13,14,16,18,22,30 Dielectric responses in organic materials have frequently been modeled using the Clausius−Mossotti 31 relationship (eq 1) relating the dielectric constant, ε, to the polarizability, α, and N, the number of molecules per unit volume. 21 However, recent work has revealed the limitations of (eq 1) for computing dielectric responses in organic materials: 32−34 ε π α π α = + − N N 3 2(4 ) 3 (4 ) (1) The limitations of the Clausius−Mossotti formalism are rooted in the relationship of a molecular property (polarizability) to a bulk materials property (dielectric constant).…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, this is realized with high dielectric constant (high-j) materials [6,7] or ultrathin self-assembled monolayer dielectrics [8,9]. In addition to above materials, an interesting alternative is to use electrolyte dielectrics to gate TFTs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%