2016
DOI: 10.1111/cup.12822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary scalp alopecia: new histopathological tools, new concepts and a practical guide to diagnosis

Abstract: ReviewPrimary scalp alopecia: new histopathological tools, new concepts and a practical guide to diagnosisThe diagnosis of primary scalp alopecia remains one of the most challenging fields in dermatopathology. In this review, we would like to connect the established classification of primary alopecia into scarring (cicatricial) and non-scarring (non-cicatricial) with current concepts. We introduce a simplified pathway for the diagnosis of the most common causes of alopecia, including a discussion of tissue pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
(151 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, the new “Hovert technique”[ 18 ] is gaining popularity, wherein the scalp biopsy is transected approximately 1 mm below the epidermal surface to obtain an “epidermal disc.” This epidermal disc is subjected to vertical sectioning in conventional fashion, whereas the remaining lower portion of the biopsy is sliced for horizontal sections. Kolivras and Thompson[ 19 ] employed the Hovert technique and found the procedure to improve and simplify the diagnostics. However, more studies need to be conducted to affirm the efficiency and reproducibility of this newer method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the new “Hovert technique”[ 18 ] is gaining popularity, wherein the scalp biopsy is transected approximately 1 mm below the epidermal surface to obtain an “epidermal disc.” This epidermal disc is subjected to vertical sectioning in conventional fashion, whereas the remaining lower portion of the biopsy is sliced for horizontal sections. Kolivras and Thompson[ 19 ] employed the Hovert technique and found the procedure to improve and simplify the diagnostics. However, more studies need to be conducted to affirm the efficiency and reproducibility of this newer method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inherited forms are relatively rare, affect a younger age group, and result either from improper development or nondevelopment of follicles or due to a defective hair shaft. The acquired forms are more common, affect an older age group, and are broadly classified into diffuse, patterned, and focal hair loss, each further sub‐divided into scarring (cicatricial) and nonscarring (noncicatricial) forms …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acquired forms are more common, affect an older age group, and are broadly classified into diffuse, patterned, and focal hair loss, each further sub-divided into scarring (cicatricial) and nonscarring (noncicatricial) forms. 3,4,5 At birth approximately 5 million hair follicles are present, and no new hair follicles are added afterward. 6 During lifetime, each hair follicle undergoes continuous cycles of growth (anagen), resorption (catagen) and rest (telogen).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distinguishing between scarring and nonscarring alopecia has important implications on diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Making this distinction has long been a challenge for dermatologists and dermatopathologists alike, and new classification schemata have been the subject of discussion in the literature …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Making this distinction has long been a challenge for dermatologists and dermatopathologists alike, and new classification schemata have been the subject of discussion in the literature. 1,2 Classically, scarring alopecia involves an inflammatory process that destroys the hair follicle 3 and includes multiple disease entities. 4 Conversely, nonscarring alopecia occurs through a variety of mechanisms but does not destroy follicles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%