2006
DOI: 10.1029/2005wr004096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Price elasticity reconsidered: Panel estimation of an agricultural water demand function

Abstract: [1] Using panel data from a period of water rate reform, this paper estimates the price elasticity of irrigation water demand. Price elasticity is decomposed into the direct effect of water management and the indirect effect of water price on choice of output and irrigation technology. The model is estimated using an instrumental variables strategy to account for the endogeneity of technology and output choices in the water demand equation. Estimation results indicate that the price elasticity of agricultural … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
82
1
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
82
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Dinar and Subramanian (1998) water pricing encourages water users to utilize this valuable resources more wisely by giving them information on water's economic, or scarcity value. Schoengold et al (2006) confirmed that an increase in marginal water price leads to reduced water application and may encourage a shift in cropping patterns. In contrast, Molle (2008) argues that the potential of pricing irrigation water to improve water allocation and regulate water use is often lower than expected.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…According to Dinar and Subramanian (1998) water pricing encourages water users to utilize this valuable resources more wisely by giving them information on water's economic, or scarcity value. Schoengold et al (2006) confirmed that an increase in marginal water price leads to reduced water application and may encourage a shift in cropping patterns. In contrast, Molle (2008) argues that the potential of pricing irrigation water to improve water allocation and regulate water use is often lower than expected.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Despite the policy significance and conceptual simplicity, there are few empirical studies that have estimated α (Appels et al, 2004: Schoengold et al, 2005. The major reason for the lack of such studies is due to the paucity of data on observed market prices and quantities of water traded (Appels, 2004;Brookshire et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major reason for the lack of such studies is due to the paucity of data on observed market prices and quantities of water traded (Appels, 2004;Brookshire et al, 2004). Therefore, most studies have used simulated data in estimating α (Appels, 2004;Schoengold et al, 2005) and are not based on observed farmers' behavior. Appels et al (2004) comprehensively reviewed studies undertaken between 1986 and 2004 on responsiveness of demand for irrigation water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Dinar and Subramanian (1998), water pricing could reveal the economic and scarcity value of this valuable resource and encourages water users to utilize water resources more wisely (Dinar and Subramanian, 1998). Furthermore, prices could guide farmers to adopt irrigation technologies with high irrigation efficiency or to change to a more productive cropping pattern (Adusumilli et al, 2011;Schoengold et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%