2002
DOI: 10.1006/bcon.2001.0999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prey Suitability of Galerucella pusilla Eggs for Two Generalist Predators, Coleomegilla maculata and Chrysoperla carnea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, we did Þnd that biotic interference slowed population increase of G. calmariensis by up to 3-fold over populations in which predators were excluded. Observations that some wetlands are consistently slow to develop large Galerucella populations (Landis et al 2003, Wiebe andObrycki 2002) suggest that predation may play a role in this situation. Studies that address the inßuence of wetland plant community structure and ßooding regimes on predator communities and alternative prey abundance are needed to further understand the potential impact of biotic interference on G. calmariensis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternatively, we did Þnd that biotic interference slowed population increase of G. calmariensis by up to 3-fold over populations in which predators were excluded. Observations that some wetlands are consistently slow to develop large Galerucella populations (Landis et al 2003, Wiebe andObrycki 2002) suggest that predation may play a role in this situation. Studies that address the inßuence of wetland plant community structure and ßooding regimes on predator communities and alternative prey abundance are needed to further understand the potential impact of biotic interference on G. calmariensis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Successfully mated females oviposit, and the resulting larvae must survive to adulthood to colonize the patch. Wiebe and Obrycki (2002) found that Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) and C. maculata, both common generalist predators in Iowa wetlands, consumed and could complete development on G. pusilla eggs. They suggested that predation may partially explain the low populations of G. pusilla observed in some Iowa wetlands.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus on those features that are widely considered to characterize generalist species has provided few reliable generalizations about predators that can be used to improve biological control outcomes. Putatively generalist predators are assumed to be effective biocontrol agents (Agusti & Gabarra, ; Bjorkman et al ., ) because they are able to feed opportunistically on alternative food sources as they become relatively abundant (Chang & Kareiva, ; Bilde, Axelsen & Toft, ; Symondson et al ., ; Wiebe & Obrycki, ; Harwood & Obrycki, ; Evans, ). Such behaviour in predators would have obvious advantages for biological control, and they do feed as expected at times, but such behaviour is surprisingly difficult to demonstrate conclusively in the field.…”
Section: Ecological Generalism and Implications For Biocontrolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Failure of populations to build for years after initial releases is occasionally reported (Blossey et al 2001, Seboldt and Landis 2002, Wiebe and Obrycki 2002, Landis et al 2003. For some of these areas, data on interference of generalist predators already exists (Nechols et al 1996, Wiebe andObrycki 2002); for other sites this remains speculation. Generalist predation was considered a risk for G. calmariensis as early as 1991 (Nechols et al 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…calmariensis appears to have the reproductive capacity and behavioral mechanisms allowing the species to escape its natural enemies, these data from our mesocosm and field cage studies may not hold true across the entire current North American distribution of the leaf beetle. Failure of populations to build for years after initial releases is occasionally reported (Blossey et al 2001, Seboldt and Landis 2002, Wiebe and Obrycki 2002, Landis et al 2003). For some of these areas, data on interference of generalist predators already exists (Nechols et al 1996, Wiebe and Obrycki 2002); for other sites this remains speculation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%