2003
DOI: 10.1017/s0952836903003765
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prey abundance and prey selection by tigers (Panthera tigris) in a semi‐arid, dry deciduous forest in western India

Abstract: Food habits of tigers Panthera tigris in terms of prey abundance were studied in the semi-arid deciduous forests of Ranthambhore National Park, western India, between November 2000 and April 2001. Wild prey availability was assessed by line transects (n = 8) and prey selection by the tigers was determined from analysis of scats (n = 109). Compared to some other parts of the country, prey abundance was found to be high at 96.65 animals km − 2 . Chital Axis axis was the most abundant wild prey in the study area,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
103
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
11
103
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Ranathambore Tiger Reserve and Sariska Tiger Reserve both lies in Aravalli hills with similar habitat condition, environmental condition and prey base. The re-introduced tigers in Sariska TR consumed largely sambar (41.7%), chital (26.2%) and nilgai (10.7%), which are very similar to the previous study in Ranathambore Tiger Reserve (original habitat of re-introduced tigers), where tigers found to consume largely chital (45.7%), sambar (36.9%) and nilgai (3.3%) (Bagchi et al 2003). Because of the presence of around 10,000 livestock population in the study area, the contribution of livestock in tiger diet is higher in Sariska TR (19.4%) than Ranthambore Tiger Reserve (5.5%), as there is no village situated inside Ranathambore Tiger Reserve.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Ranathambore Tiger Reserve and Sariska Tiger Reserve both lies in Aravalli hills with similar habitat condition, environmental condition and prey base. The re-introduced tigers in Sariska TR consumed largely sambar (41.7%), chital (26.2%) and nilgai (10.7%), which are very similar to the previous study in Ranathambore Tiger Reserve (original habitat of re-introduced tigers), where tigers found to consume largely chital (45.7%), sambar (36.9%) and nilgai (3.3%) (Bagchi et al 2003). Because of the presence of around 10,000 livestock population in the study area, the contribution of livestock in tiger diet is higher in Sariska TR (19.4%) than Ranthambore Tiger Reserve (5.5%), as there is no village situated inside Ranathambore Tiger Reserve.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This method has been widely applied to estimate densities of prey species in different forest in Indian subcontinent (Karanth & Sunquist 1995;Khan et al 1996;Biswas & Sankar 2002;Sankar & Johnsingh 2002;Bagchi et al 2003). The study area was divided into 40 grids of 4 km 2 covering 160 km 2 areas.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In India, the endangered Indian tiger (Panthera tigris tigris) preys on B. tragocamelus, although it constitutes only 5-7% of prey items in Ranthambhore National Park (Bagchi et al 2003c), 2.7% in Sariska Tiger Reserve (Sankar and Johnsingh 2002), and 3.6% in Nagarjunasagar Srisailam Tiger Reserve (Reedy et al 2004). In Pench National Park, India, tigers do not prey on B. tragocamelus (Biswas and Sankar 2002).…”
Section: Ontogeny and Reproductionmentioning
confidence: 99%