Conflict between people and felids is one of the most urgent wild cat conservation issues worldwide, yet efforts to synthesize knowledge about these conflicts have been few. For management strategies to be effective a thorough understanding of the dynamics of human-felid conflicts is necessary. Here we present the results of a crossspecies, systematic review of human-felid conflicts worldwide. Using a combination of literature review and geographical information system analyses, we provide a quantitative as well as qualitative assessment of patterns and determinants that are known to influence the severity of human-felid conflicts, and a geographical overview of the occurrence of conflict worldwide. We found evidence of conflict affecting over 75% of the world's felid species. The severity of conflict increases with felid body mass and is of greatest conservation significance to nine species: caracal, cheetah, Eurasian lynx, jaguar, leopard, lion, puma, snow leopard and tiger. We also reveal specific gaps in knowledge about human-felid conflicts, and required actions within this aspect of felid conservation. With only 31% of implemented management strategies having been evaluated scientifically, there is a need for greater and more rigorous evaluation and a wider dissemination of results. Also urgently required are standardized reporting techniques to reduce the current disparity in conflict reporting methods and facilitate resolution of patterns and trends in the scale of human-felid conflict worldwide. This review provides a basis both for further synthesis and for the coordination of human-felid conflict management among researchers, practitioners and organizations.
ADHD is a psychiatric disorder which is characterized by hyperactivity, impulsivity and attention problems. Due to recent findings of microbial involvement in other psychiatric disorders like autism and depression, a role of the gut microbiota in ADHD pathogenesis is assumed but has not yet been investigated. In this study, the gut microbiota of 14 male ADHD patients (mean age: 11.9 yrs.) and 17 male controls (mean age: 13.1 yrs.) was examined via next generation sequencing of 16S rDNA and analyzed for diversity and biomarkers. We found that the microbial diversity (alpha diversity) was significantly decreased in ADHD patients compared to controls (pShannon = 0.036) and that the composition (beta diversity) differed significantly between patients and controls (pANOSIM = 0.033, pADONIS = 0.006, pbetadisper = 0.002). In detail, the bacterial family Prevotellacae was associated with controls, while patients with ADHD showed elevated levels of Bacteroidaceae, and both Neisseriaceae and Neisseria spec. were found as possible biomarkers for juvenile ADHD. Our results point to a possible link of certain microbiota with ADHD, with Neisseria spec. being a very promising ADHD-associated candidate. This finding provides the basis for a systematic, longitudinal assessment of the role of the gut microbiome in ADHD, yielding promising potential for both prevention and therapeutic intervention.
In a world of shrinking habitats and increasing competition for natural resources, potentially dangerous predators bring the challenges of coexisting with wildlife sharply into focus. Through interdisciplinary collaboration among authors trained in the humanitiesPalabras Clave: conflicto humano -vida silvestre, depredadores, investigación interdisciplinaria, manejo de la conservación
Blood glucose measurements are generally accepted components of a modern diabetes self-management. The value of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is, however, discussed controversially and only a few studies addressed the efficacy of SMBG under real-life conditions so far. In order to investigate whether the frequency of SMBG is related to long-term metabolic control, data from the DPV-Wiss-database, a standardized,prospective, computer-based documentation of diabetes care and outcome, were analyzed for patients with type 1(n = 19,491) and type 2 (n = 5,009) diabetes from 191 centers in Germany and Austria. Local HbA1c reference ranges were mathematically adjusted to the DCCT reference. For each patient, data from the most recent year of diabetes care were used. On average,patients with type 1 diabetes performed 4.4 blood glucose measurements/day. Corrected for age, gender, diabetes duration,on intensified (>or=4 daily injections or CSII) therapy (HbA1c reduction of 0.32% for one additional SMBG/day) compared to patients on conventional (1-3 daily injections) therapy(HbA1c-reduction of 0.16% for one additional SMBG/day). In 2,021 patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (2.7 measurements/day), more frequent SMBG was associated with better metabolic control (HbA1c-reduction of 0.16% for one additionalSMBG/day, p < 0.0001), while in 2,988 patients on OAD or diet alone (2.0 measurements/day), more frequent blood glucose measurements were associated with higher HbA1c-levels(HbA1c-increase of 0.14% for one additional SMBG/day,p < 0.0001). These data indicate that more frequent SMBG are associated with better metabolic control in both, patients with type 1 and insulin-treated type 2 diabetes. Since no benefit ofSMBG on metabolic control was found in patients with type 2 diabetes on OAD or diet alone, SMBG should primarily be recommended for those patients with suboptimal metabolic control whereas the benefit of SHBG in non-insulin-treated patients with adequate HbA1c-levels remains uncertain.insulin therapy and center difference, the SMBG frequency was associated with better metabolic control (HbA1c-reduction of0.26% for one additional SMBG/day, p < 0.0001). HbA1c-reduction with higher frequency of SMBG was more pronounced in patients Blood glucose measurements are generally accepted components of a modern diabetes self-management. The value of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is, however, discussed controversially and only a few studies addressed the efficacy of SMBG under real-life conditions so far. In order to investigate whether the frequency of SMBG is related to long-term metabolic control, data from the DPV-Wiss-database, a standardized,prospective, computer-based documentation of diabetes care and outcome, were analyzed for patients with type 1(n = 19,491) and type 2 (n = 5,009) diabetes from 191 centers in Germany and Austria. Local HbA1c reference ranges were mathematically adjusted to the DCCT reference. For each patient, data from the most recent year of diabetes care were used. On averag...
Large-scale forest encroachment in Assam, India, has led to increasing levels of human-elephant conflict. Conflict mitigation is a priority for the survival of Asian elephants Elephas maximus throughout Asia. We analysed a 3-year dataset of elephant occurrence and related instances of human-elephant conflict, from two sites in Assam, and explored the relationships between the various effects of elephants on human communities and factors influencing the spatial and temporal occurrence of these effects (proximity to water, refuge areas and villages, and human and crop density). The landscapes at both study sites have been transformed by forest loss, with large areas converted to agriculture. Remaining forest patches, which are mostly small, disconnected and degraded, as well as tea plantations, provide refuge areas for elephants as they move through the region. We found that crop depredation and property damage caused by elephants showed well-defined seasonal trends. They also showed a clear diurnal pattern, mostly occurring between 18.00 and 22.00. Small communities within 700 m of a refuge were most affected. In the management of human-elephant conflict in Assam we need to consider the refuge patches used by elephants as they move through the region, the peripheries of which are likely to be conflict hotspots. Small villages on the edges of refuges should be a priority for conflict mitigation assistance, with strategies taking into account seasonal and diurnal variation in elephant behaviour, as well as the socio-economic and cultural composition of communities.
The raiding of crops by elephants is one of the major components of humanelephant conflict, causing loss of livelihood and retaliation against elephants. To mitigate this conflict, various intervention methods are in use by farmers across Africa and Asia; yet there have been few rigorous assessments of their effectiveness. We provide an assessment of the efficacy of interventions in use by communities in Assam from a 3-year survey dataset using Generalized Linear Mixed Modeling. We found spotlights, chili fences, and electric fences to be highly effective at preventing crop damage by elephants when used in isolation, but when used in combination with noise their efficacy was compromised. Our study highlights the importance of evaluating intervention methods to determine their effectiveness. We propose the use of fences and spotlights be promoted in Assam, in conjunction with long-term habitat protection and restoration strategies.
Summary In dryland ecosystems, mobility is essential for both wildlife and people to access unpredictable and spatially heterogeneous resources, particularly in the face of climate change. Fences can prevent connectivity vital for this mobility. There are recent calls for large‐scale barrier fencing interventions to address human–wildlife conflict and illegal resource extraction. Fencing has costs and benefits to people and wildlife. However, the evidence available for facilitating sound decision‐making for fencing initiatives is limited, particularly for drylands. We identify six research areas that are key to informing evaluations of fencing initiatives: economics, edge permeability, reserve design, connectivity, ecosystem services and communities. Policy implications. Implementing this research agenda to evaluate fencing interventions in dryland ecosystems will enable better management and policy decisions. The United Nations Conventions on Migratory Species (CMS) and to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) are appropriate international agreements for moving this agenda forward and leading the development of policies and guidelines on fencing in drylands.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
334 Leonard St
Brooklyn, NY 11211
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.