2017
DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An interdisciplinary review of current and future approaches to improving human–predator relations

Abstract: In a world of shrinking habitats and increasing competition for natural resources, potentially dangerous predators bring the challenges of coexisting with wildlife sharply into focus. Through interdisciplinary collaboration among authors trained in the humanitiesPalabras Clave: conflicto humano -vida silvestre, depredadores, investigación interdisciplinaria, manejo de la conservación

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
220
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 282 publications
(236 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(82 reference statements)
1
220
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Recognition about the need for approaching biodiversity conservation from a social-ecological perspective is now highlighted in the research agenda (Ban et al 2013;Martín-López & Montes 2015;Bennet et al 2016). One of the reasons for mainstreaming the social dimensions (i.e., perceptions, values, beliefs, or attitudes) in biodiversity conservation (Bennet et al 2016;Pooley et al 2017) is the acknowledgment of the crucial role of biodiversity in supporting human well-being through the provision of ecosystem services (e.g., MA 2005;Díaz et al 2006;Cardinale et al 2012), which are understood as the benefits (and occasionally detriments) that people obtain from ecosystems . In this sense, it has recently been recognized that the same ecosystem service can be perceived as benign or harmful, depending on the social actors involved (Saunders & Luck 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recognition about the need for approaching biodiversity conservation from a social-ecological perspective is now highlighted in the research agenda (Ban et al 2013;Martín-López & Montes 2015;Bennet et al 2016). One of the reasons for mainstreaming the social dimensions (i.e., perceptions, values, beliefs, or attitudes) in biodiversity conservation (Bennet et al 2016;Pooley et al 2017) is the acknowledgment of the crucial role of biodiversity in supporting human well-being through the provision of ecosystem services (e.g., MA 2005;Díaz et al 2006;Cardinale et al 2012), which are understood as the benefits (and occasionally detriments) that people obtain from ecosystems . In this sense, it has recently been recognized that the same ecosystem service can be perceived as benign or harmful, depending on the social actors involved (Saunders & Luck 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The social, cultural, political, historical and symbolic meanings people attribute to an animal species, whether domestic or wild, shape the way in which people perceive and treat that species [Richards, 2000;Costa et al, 2013;Goldman et al, 2013;Pooley et al, 2017]. Human-animal relations differ considerably across societies and among cultural contexts within societies [Marvin, 2000;Milton, 2000;Watson and Huntington, 2008;Baynes-Rock, 2013].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As sites in WEFCOM become more successful in conserving tigers, the population of these large predators will inevitably increase and some of the marginal tigers (often young males) can be expected to move outside of the protected areas and become a problem to the local people, and to DNP (Seidensticker et al, 1999). Solutions to this problem are now being implemented, such as identifying the sources of the conflicts and their historical dimensions, exploring cultural ways of interacting with predators, and developing ways of mitigating conflics (Pooley et al, 2016).…”
Section: Challenges Of Protected Area Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%