Wild Rangelands 2009
DOI: 10.1002/9781444317091.ch6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contemporary Views of Human–Carnivore Conflicts on Wild Rangelands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
19
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research on an array of species in an array of geographical locations also indicate that negative interactions with wildlife influence people's attitudes toward wildlife (Riley and Decker 2000b;Naughton-Treves and Treves 2005;Wang et al 2006;Romañach et al 2007;Zimmermann et al 2010). In the Pantanal of Brazil, for example, respondents whose cattle had been attacked by jaguars (Panthera onca) were more likely to view jaguars as a threat (Zimmermann et al 2005).…”
Section: Conceptual Background: Attitudes Toward Wildlifementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous research on an array of species in an array of geographical locations also indicate that negative interactions with wildlife influence people's attitudes toward wildlife (Riley and Decker 2000b;Naughton-Treves and Treves 2005;Wang et al 2006;Romañach et al 2007;Zimmermann et al 2010). In the Pantanal of Brazil, for example, respondents whose cattle had been attacked by jaguars (Panthera onca) were more likely to view jaguars as a threat (Zimmermann et al 2005).…”
Section: Conceptual Background: Attitudes Toward Wildlifementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Pantanal of Brazil, for example, respondents whose cattle had been attacked by jaguars (Panthera onca) were more likely to view jaguars as a threat (Zimmermann et al 2005). In addition to direct negative interactions, indirect negative interactions such as hearing or reading about wildlife attacks on livestock or people may also engender negative attitudes (Karlsson and Sjöström 2007;Zimmermann et al 2010). For example, Karlsson and Sjöström (2007) attributed negative attitudes toward wolves (Canis lupus) in Sweden to exposure to negative information about wolves from friends, peers, and media.…”
Section: Conceptual Background: Attitudes Toward Wildlifementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human settlements surround and encroach into tiger habitat degrading natural areas and potentially increasing levels of environmental stress for tigers. This region has also experienced severe socio-political unrest, which included 10 year civil war during the Maoist insurgency, that has negatively impacted fragile ecosystems with weakened wildlife conservation programs [35, 36]. Considering the degree of environmental degradation in conjunction with habitat loss and fragmentation over the last century [32], it is vital to take a multidimensional and interdisciplinary approach to monitoring and managing the health of wild tiger subpopulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a response to such conflicts, affected people tend to persecute the species of wild animal involved. Persecution in the context of human-wild animal conflict is different from hunting itself because in hunting the hunter sees a product (meat, trophy, and sport), while in conflict, the aim is to threaten or eradicate the individual animal involved or even the species (Zimmermann et al, 2010). Hunting as means of defense against predators is generally carried out in response to conflicts caused by damage to domestic animals or crops, or in response to the danger that animals pose to people (Alves, Gonc¸alves, & Vieira, 2012;Alves et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%