2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevention of postmolar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia using prophylactic single bolus dose of actinomycin D in high-risk hydatidiform mole: A simple, effective, secure and low-cost approach without adverse effects on compliance to general follow-up or subsequent treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Study III demonstrated that the risk of post-molar GTN after a CHM was 13% and after a PHM 2%. This result is comparable to results from other European studies (148,155), but is lower than in reports from the USA and South America, something which is usually attributed to different treatment indications rather than a true difference in the rate of post-molar GTN (156,157). The risk of malignant progression is significantly higher for CHM, which is reflected in the duration of the recommended hCG surveillance.…”
Section: Post-molar Gtnsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Study III demonstrated that the risk of post-molar GTN after a CHM was 13% and after a PHM 2%. This result is comparable to results from other European studies (148,155), but is lower than in reports from the USA and South America, something which is usually attributed to different treatment indications rather than a true difference in the rate of post-molar GTN (156,157). The risk of malignant progression is significantly higher for CHM, which is reflected in the duration of the recommended hCG surveillance.…”
Section: Post-molar Gtnsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Since 1966, several studies have focused on the primary prevention of postmolar GTN and have evaluated prophylactic chemotherapy with methotrexate or actinomycin D, but their results have been controversial. 13 According to Berkowitz and Goldstein, hydatidiform mole can be divided into low and high risk for persistence based on signs and symptoms of marked trophoblastic proliferation at the time of evacuation, i.e. hCG >100 000 miu/ml, excessive uterine enlargement and theca lutein ovarian cyst >6 cm in diameter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the use of chemotherapy for primary prevention of post-molar GTN remains controversial as there is conflicting data regarding efficacy (Ayhan et al 1990). Patients with high-risk hydatidiform moles, as defined in Table 9, have up to a 50% chance of developing post-molar GTN (Uberti et al 2009). It has been argued that chemotherapy administered at the time of uterine evacuation in this patient population can prevent the development of GTN; however, studies have shown that prophylactic chemotherapy is not without risk.…”
Section: Post-molar Prophylactic Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those who receive chemoprophylaxis are known to have prolonged hospital stays and chemotherapy-related toxicities and require more courses of chemotherapy to cure subsequent GTN, all of which may seem too risky for a disease with an excellent cure rate. Nevertheless, it does not affect reproductive outcomes and has also been shown to reduce psychological angst, medical visits, and operational costs associated with management of post-molar GTN/persistent GTD (Uberti et al 2009). Though the use of chemoprophylaxis is not widely accepted, most agree that its use is most appropriate for patients with high-risk moles in settings where serial beta-hCG levels cannot be followed and in those with poor compliance, such as in the adolescent population (Uberti et al 2006).…”
Section: Post-molar Prophylactic Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%