(40) con severa. La relación factor familiar con tipo de familia y manifestaciones depresivas, hizo ver que el 40,7% (27) pertenece a familias extendidas y presentan manifestaciones depresivas definidas, y el 3,1% (1) de familia monoparental presenta depresión; aunque las diferencias no resultaron significativas (p=0,712). La relación funcionalidad familiar y manifestaciones depresivas mostró que el 50,0% (20) de adolescentes de familias con disfunción severa presentan manifestaciones depresivas bien definidas, y el 46,5% (20) de familias con disfuncionalidad moderada también presenta manifestaciones depresivas bien definidas; incluso un 18,4% (7) proveniente de familias con buen funcionamiento presentan manifestaciones depresivas bien definidas. Las diferencias resultaron significativas (p=0,030). Conclusiones: las manifestaciones depresivas tienen relación directa con el funcionamiento de la familia, siendo este dato significativo (p=0,030). En tanto, las manifestaciones depresivas no guardan relación con el tipo de familia (p=0,712).
Palabras clave: familia, transttornos de adaptabilidad, adolescentes. Perú. (Fuente DeCs BIREME).
Family factors that influence adolescent depressive manifestations in a mixed secondary school national ABSTRACTObjetive: Determine the family factors that influence in the depressive manifestations in adolescents from 1 st to 5 th course of secondary school at 2022 school in Los Olivos, Lima, Peru, 2013. Material and Methods: This research is a descriptive transversal study. The population was 163 students that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: The predominant family type was the extended family: 40.5% (66) of the adolescents. The family dysfunction level was high: the 26.4% (43) had moderate dysfunction and the 24.5% (40) had severe dysfunction. The relationship between family factors, family type and depressive manifestations showed that the 40.7% (27) was part of extended families with depressive manifestations and the 3.1% (1) of adolescents with mono parental families had depression, even though these results were not statistically significant (p=0.712). The 50% (20) of the adolescents from families with severe dysfunction had depressive manifestations, the 46.5% (20) of the adolescents from families with moderate dysfunction also had depressive manifestations and even the 18.4% (7) of adolescents from normal families had depressive manifestations. This results showed to be statistically significant (p=0.030). Conclusion: The presence of depressive manifestations is related to the family functionality, which showed to be statistically significant (p=0.030). At the same time, the association between depressive manifestations and type of family is not statistically significant (p=0.712).