2020
DOI: 10.22201/fm.14058871p.2020.4.76891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalencia de depresión, ansiedad y estrés académico entre estudiantes de medicina, durante distintos periodos de estrés

Abstract: <p><strong>Objetivo: </strong>determinar la prevalencia y severidad de ansiedad, depresión y estrés académico; evaluar la variación entre un periodo con alto (pae) y bajo nivel de estrés (pbe). <strong>Métodos:</strong> Se realizó un estudio descriptivo longitudinal, utilizando los inventarios de Ansiedad-Depresión de Beck y estrés académico, durante un periodo de exámenes y otro libre de evaluación en estudiantes de medicina de la Universidad Veracruzana. <strong>Resultados… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results obtained in this research support and contribute to previous reports, which point out that the main factors limiting the effectiveness of online MBI is: low adherence to the program, high dropout rate, loss of interest due to poor virtual interaction, lack of time for medical students, concerns about digital privacy, stigma about psychopathologies, and lack of emotional openness (Puig-Lagunes et al, 2020;Sancho et al, 2018;Schuman-Olivier et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The results obtained in this research support and contribute to previous reports, which point out that the main factors limiting the effectiveness of online MBI is: low adherence to the program, high dropout rate, loss of interest due to poor virtual interaction, lack of time for medical students, concerns about digital privacy, stigma about psychopathologies, and lack of emotional openness (Puig-Lagunes et al, 2020;Sancho et al, 2018;Schuman-Olivier et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%