Prevalence of traumatic dental injuries and associated factors among 8 to 12-years-old schoolchildren in Diyarbakir, Turkey

Tümen, Emin Caner; Yavuz, İzzet; Kaya, Savaş; Uysal, Ersin; Tumen, Demet Suer; Ünüvar, Yazgı Ay; Başaran, Ğüvenç; Adıgüzel, Özkan; Değer, Yalçın; Laçin, N

doi:10.4103/1119-3077.219518

Cited by 17 publications

(37 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This review identified 3718 articles (Figure ). After screening, full‐text assessment, and contacting 27 authors for further information, a total of 41 studies with 66 366 participants were included in the review (Table ) . Twenty‐seven studies were published within the past 10 years, nine between 10 and 15 years ago, and five were published more than 15 years ago.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The association of overjet size and traumatic dental injuries—A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Arraj

Rossi‐Fedele

Doğramacı

2019

Dental Traumatology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background/Aims Traumatic dental injuries are one of the most prevalent diseases globally, impacting people of different ages and socio‐economic statuses. As disease prevention is preferable to management, understanding when an individual's overjet is prone to dental trauma helps identify at‐risk patients, so to institute preventive strategies. The aim of this study was to identify the different overjet sizes that present an increased risk for developing dental trauma across different ages and dentition stages. Methods The title and protocol were registered and published a priori with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and PROSPERO (CRD42017060907) and followed the JBI methodology of systematic reviews of association (etiology). A three‐step search strategy was performed, including electronic searches of gray literature and four databases. Studies of healthy human participants of any age and in any dental dentition stage were considered for inclusion. Only high methodological quality studies with low risk of bias were included. Where possible, meta‐analyses were performed using the random‐effects model, supplemented with the fixed‐effects model in situations where statistical heterogeneity was ≤50%, assessed using the I2 statistic. Results The study identified 3718 articles, 41 were included. An increased overjet was significantly associated with higher odds of developing trauma in all dentition stages and age groups. Children 0‐6 years with an overjet ≥3mm have an odds of 3.37 (95%CI, 1.36‐8.38, P = 0.009) for trauma. Children in the mixed and secondary dentition with an overjet >5mm have an odds of 2.43 (95%CI, 1.34‐4.42, P = 0.004). Twelve‐year‐old children with an overjet >5mm have an odds of 1.81 (95%CI, 1.44‐2.27, P < 0.0001). Conclusions The results confirm the association between increased overjet and dental trauma. A child in the primary dentition could be considered as having an overjet at risk for trauma when it is ≥3mm. In the early secondary dentition, the threshold for trauma is an overjet ≥5mm.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The association of overjet size and traumatic dental injuries—A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Arraj

Rossi‐Fedele

Doğramacı

2019

Dental Traumatology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The confounding variables used in this study were selected on the basis of previous literature. [17][18][19] A P-value lower than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Sex, age, monthly household income, and dental caries experience were used as confounding variables in the adjusted model, independently of the P ‐value in the crude analysis. The confounding variables used in this study were selected on the basis of previous literature . A P ‐value lower than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is dental trauma more prevalent in maltreated children? A comparative Study in Southern Brazil

Silva-Júnior

Hartwig

Goettems

et al. 2019

Int J Paed Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Although a high prevalence of head and neck trauma has been reported in maltreated children and adolescents, most of these studies focused on record‐based analyses, and only a few used control groups. Aim To assess the presence of dental trauma in maltreated children in comparison with children without a history of maltreatment. Design A cross‐sectional study with 68 maltreated children and 204 age, sex‐, and school‐matched control participants was conducted in Pelotas, a Southern Brazilian city. Socioeconomic and demographic data were collected. Clinical examinations were performed to evaluate dental trauma (O'Brien Index) and dental caries (WHO criteria). Fisher's exact and chi‐squared tests were used for intergroup comparisons of socioeconomic and clinical variables. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to obtain adjusted odds ratios (OR). Results The prevalence of dental trauma was 23.53% (n = 16) among maltreated children and 14.22% (n = 29) in the comparative group. After adjustment, the occurrence of dental trauma showed association with child maltreatment, with an OR of 2.14 (95% confidence interval 1.03‐4.44) for maltreated children in comparison with children in the comparative group (P = 0.04). Conclusions Maltreated children presented with more dental trauma than those with no history of maltreatment.

show abstract

“…Así, la prevalencia de niños con traumatismo dental en esta muestra de pacientes que acudieron a una clínica especializada en odontopediatría en una universidad pública fue del 12%. Esta cifra es similar a la reportada por Freire- (13) Maia et al, (14%) en su estudio realizado en Brasil en niños de 8 a 10 años; más baja que la observada en (14) niños de 3 a 5 años por Sulieman y Awooda (18%) (11) en Sudan, y en Irán por Eslamipour et al, (23.8%) en niños de 9 a 14 años; pero más alta que en el (12) estudio realizado en Turquía por Tumen et al, (4.6%) en niños de 8 a 12 años, y en Reino Unido por (10) Blokland et al, (9%) en sujetos de 8 a 15 años. Sin embargo, es necesario destacar que los intervalos de edad no son exactamente iguales a los incluidos en 6 este estudio.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

“…Recientes revisiones han explorado la ocurrencia de trauma dental en diferentes regiones del mundo y revelaron que aproximadamente el 30% de los niños en edad preescolar han sufrido un traumatismo dental en la dentición primaria y el 25% de los escolares han sufrido un trauma dental que (9) involucra la dentición permanente . De igual forma, se ha informado una gran variación de su incidencia (10)(11)(12)(13)(14) dentro y entre los países . La variación de la prevalencia del trauma dental entre los estudios puede atribuirse a la ubicación geográfica, las disparidades ambientales y socioeconómicas, los criterios diagnósticos utilizados, así como las (9) diferencias en las muestras estudiadas .…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Traumatismo dental en pacientes pediátricos que acuden a una clínica universitaria de odontopediatría: un análisis retrospectivo de historias clínicas

Martínez¹,

Bermeo²,

Hernández-Martínez³

et al. 2019

Pediatr (Asunción).

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objetivo: Determinar la prevalencia de traumatismos dentales en los pacientes que acuden a una clínica de Especialidad en Odontopediatría. Materiales y Métodos: Se realizó un estudio transversal retrolectivo, se incluyeron 309 expedientes clínicos de pacientes de 2 a 12 años de edad que acudieron para su atención a la clínica de la Especialidad de Odontopediatría de una universidad pública en Toluca, México. La variable dependiente fue la prevalencia de traumatismo dental. Las variables independientes incluidas en el estudio fueron: edad del paciente y sexo. El análisis estadístico se realizó utilizando pruebas no paramétricas en Stata 11. Resultados: El promedio de edad fue de 5.71±2.43 años y el 50.8% fueron hombres. La prevalencia de traumatismo dental previo al estudio fue de 12.0% (IC 95% = 8.3 – 15.6). En el análisis bivariado, a pesar de que los varones presentaron una prevalencia de traumatismo dental de 14.0% y entre las mujeres fue de 9.9%, estas diferencias no fueron estadísticamente significativas (p=0.262). Se observó que los niños con traumatismo dental fueron más pequeños (promedio de edad = 4.74±1.86) que los que no presentaron traumatismo dental (promedio de edad = 5.84±2.47) (p=0.0166). Al realizar la prueba de tendencia no paramétrica se notó que la disminución de la prevalencia de traumatismo dental fue significativa (p=0.026). Conclusiones: La prevalencia de traumatismo dental en esta muestra de niños fue de 12%. No se observó diferencia por sexo. Los más pequeños presentaron más traumatismo dental que los más grandes. Correspondencia: Carlo Eduardo Medina-Solís; Correo: cemedinas@yahoo.com Conflicto de interés: Los autores declaran no tener conflicto de intereses. Recibido: 27/10/2018; Aceptado: 22/11/2018

show abstract

Prevalence of traumatic dental injuries and associated factors among 8 to 12-years-old schoolchildren in Diyarbakir, Turkey

Cited by 17 publications

References 0 publications

The association of overjet size and traumatic dental injuries—A systematic review and meta‐analysis

The association of overjet size and traumatic dental injuries—A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Is dental trauma more prevalent in maltreated children? A comparative Study in Southern Brazil

Traumatismo dental en pacientes pediátricos que acuden a una clínica universitaria de odontopediatría: un análisis retrospectivo de historias clínicas

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About