2017
DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2017.603.134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Salmonella Strains in Cattle Breeding in the District of Abidjan (Côte d'Ivoire)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…was isolated from market poultry faeces and from farm sheep. This prevalence is low compared to 20% of René et al [16] in Abidjan and 3.6% found by Barilli et al [17] in Northern Italy. However, in the studies mentioned, only pigs and cattle were considered respectively.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…was isolated from market poultry faeces and from farm sheep. This prevalence is low compared to 20% of René et al [16] in Abidjan and 3.6% found by Barilli et al [17] in Northern Italy. However, in the studies mentioned, only pigs and cattle were considered respectively.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…, Hadimli et al (2017),Rene et al (2017),Rizzi (2017) reporting the presence of this serovar within their FC isolates, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study indicating the presence of S. Enteritidis in slaughter cattle MLNs. Unusually, the other serovar isolated from FC samples was S. Albany, and our detailed literature search about this serovar revealed its rare reporting in cattle-related studies as: in bovine meat in Malaysia byFauzi et al (2016) and, as a jejunum isolate in USA byGoodman et al (2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…An additional output in our study is rPCR's performance in reliable utilization with ISO in the rapid and reliable confirmation of Salmonella-suspect isolates from cattle, and particularly from FC samples, demonstrated by an overall substantial, and a perfect agreement between two methods, respectively ( (Rene et al, 2017;Souto et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation