Prevalence of intestinal protozoan parasites among school children in africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Introduction Parasitic infections, especially intestinal protozoan parasites (IPPs) remain a significant public health issue in Africa, where many conditions favour the transmission and children are the primary victims. This systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out with the objective of assessing the prevalence of IPPs among school children in Africa. Methods Relevant studies published between January 2000 and December 2020 were identified by systematic online search on PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Scopus databases without language restriction. Pooled prevalence was estimated using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity of studies were assessed using Cochrane Q test and I2 test, while publication bias was evaluated using Egger’s test. Results Of the 1,645 articles identified through our searches, 46 cross-sectional studies matched our inclusion criteria, reported data from 29,968 school children of Africa. The pooled prevalence of intestinal protozoan parasites amongst African school children was 25.8% (95% CI: 21.2%-30.3%) with E. histolytica/ dispar (13.3%; 95% CI: 10.9%-15.9%) and Giardia spp. (12%; 95% CI: 9.8%-14.3%) were the most predominant pathogenic parasites amongst the study participants. While E. coli was the most common non-pathogenic protozoa (17.1%; 95% CI: 10.9%-23.2%). Conclusions This study revealed a relatively high prevalence of IPPs in school children, especially in northern and western Africa. Thus, poverty reduction, improvement of sanitation and hygiene and attention to preventive control measures will be the key to reducing protozoan parasite transmission.

Occupational exposure to livestock and risk of tuberculosis and brucellosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

“…Sensitivity analyses showed that the summary of the pooled estimates was unaffected significantly by the removal of outlier studies and moderate-quality studies (Supplementary file 2, Table 1 ). The prevalence rate stayed within the 95% CI for the relevant total prevalence [ 22 ]. Thus, we can conclude that the pooled estimated prevalence was validated by the reliability and rationality of our analyses.…”

“…The statistical analysis was done applying the Jamovi software (keeping the significance level at <0.05), while the Galbraith plot and geographic distribution map were generated using RStudio. Additionally, sensitivity analysis was used to examine the robustness of the pooled estimate by removing studies with small sample sizes ( n ≤ 200), studies with intermediate quality that had moderate risk of bias rating score between 6 and 7, and studies with outliers [ 22 ]. The presence of outliers was determined via a z-score approach- a score of > ± 1.96 was termed as potential outlier (Supplementary file 2, Fig.…”

Burden of anemia and intestinal parasites in farmers and family members and owned livestock in two geographic locations in Senegal before and during the rainy seasons

“…and E. coli were most frequently diagnosed in June and September, respectively. Giardia and E. coli are enteric protozoans commonly detected in human fecal samples in Senegal and other African countries [ 16 , 17 ]. Giardia sp.…”

Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

“…Each study was assessed on the basis of the proportion of ‘yes’ answers given to the items. The high proportion (≥70%) of ‘yes’ refers to high-quality study (low risk of bias), whilst the moderate (50–69%) and low proportion (≤49%) of ‘yes’ refer to moderate- and low-quality studies, respectively [ 15 , 16 , 17 ].…”