2017
DOI: 10.1159/000456013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of ‘Food Addiction' as Measured with the Yale Food Addiction Scale 2.0 in a Representative German Sample and Its Association with Sex, Age and Weight Categories

Abstract: Background/Aims: To assess the prevalence and correlates of addictive-like eating behavior in Germany. Methods: The German version of the Yale Food Addiction Scale (YFAS) 2.0 was used to investigate, for the first time, the prevalence of ‘food addiction' in a representative sample aged 18-65 years (N = 1,034). Results: The prevalence of ‘food addiction' measured by the YFAS 2.0 was 7.9%. Individuals meeting criteria for ‘food addiction' had higher BMI and were younger than individuals not meeting the threshold… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

24
81
11
10

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(76 reference statements)
24
81
11
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Almost one third of the current sample of bariatric surgery candidates met the YFAS 2.0 threshold for FA. The prevalence was higher than in the general population (Hauck et al, ), which is in line with the literature (Ivezaj et al, ) and with our hypothesis. It should be noted that the prevalence in the current sample (27.3%) was close to that reported for individuals with class 2/3 obesity from the general population (i.e., 21.6%/30.3%) by Hauck et al ().…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Almost one third of the current sample of bariatric surgery candidates met the YFAS 2.0 threshold for FA. The prevalence was higher than in the general population (Hauck et al, ), which is in line with the literature (Ivezaj et al, ) and with our hypothesis. It should be noted that the prevalence in the current sample (27.3%) was close to that reported for individuals with class 2/3 obesity from the general population (i.e., 21.6%/30.3%) by Hauck et al ().…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Using the German version of the YFAS 2.0 (Meule, Müller, Gearhardt, & Blechert, ), the prevalence of FA in the German general population was estimated to be 7.9% (Hauck, Weiss, Schulte, Meule, & Ellrott, ). Individuals with classes 2 and 3 obesity endorsed the highest rates of FA with 21.6% and 30.3% (Hauck et al, ), which corresponds with research indicating a link between FA and obesity (Davis et al, ; Gearhardt, Boswell, & White, ; Grosshans, Loeber, & Kiefer, ).…”
Section: Introduction and Aimssupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given that all main effects and interactions were significant in this multivariate model, separate models assessing the main effects and interactions of each demographic variable with mYFAS 2.0 are presented for ease of interpretation. As prior literature has observed opposite associations between age with YFAS and BMI (Flint et al, ; Hauck et al, ), all analyses examining the association of mYFAS 2.0 scores with BMI included age as a covariate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many other obese subjects do not present with an eating disorder (ED) and excessive overeating and may rather have dieted extensively in an attempt to lose weight (Thomas et al, ). Both groups are occupied with intense ruminations about food/eating and might show components of “addiction” (Hauck, Weiss, Schulte, Meule, & Ellrott, ). Two concepts to characterize overeating with respect to addiction paradigms are currently discussed (Albayrak, Wölfle, & Hebebrand, ; Long, Blundell, & Finlayson, ; Schulte, Potenza, & Gearhardt, ; Volkow, Wang, Tomasi, & Baler, ): “Food addiction” (Schulte et al, ) might represent a potential future diagnosis within the diagnostic subcategory substance use disorders (SUDs) in a future Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) version (see DSM‐5; APA, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%