2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.03.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of dental anomalies in various malocclusions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

24
186
16
12

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(238 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
24
186
16
12
Order By: Relevance
“…should identify dental anomalies by carefully examining pretreatment tests and include their management in the treatment plan (5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…should identify dental anomalies by carefully examining pretreatment tests and include their management in the treatment plan (5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,18 In contrast, Uslu et al 19 reported that Class II malocclusions are the most common (41.8%) in 900 Turkish subjects with permanent dentition. The mean prevalence of Class I malocclusion (76.9%) in our study was higher than in some other 13,19 studies and showed a decreasing trend towards the permanent dentition. Among Tanzanian and Finnish individuals, the prevalence of neutral occlusion also tends to decrease from primary to mixed dentition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3,4,5,6,7,8,13,14,15,16,18,19,21,24 It is notable that prevalence rates varied even within Turkish populations of the same origin. Differences between our results and those of other studies are most likely due to differences in the selection of subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 Females were affected more than males however there are studies that mentioned there were no differences between the genders. 6,32,33 Because of these different results a comprehensive countrywide study is needed. Although it was reported that there is no difference in dental anomalies in regard to age, 33 in this study age had a significant relation with dental anomalies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,32,33 Because of these different results a comprehensive countrywide study is needed. Although it was reported that there is no difference in dental anomalies in regard to age, 33 in this study age had a significant relation with dental anomalies. These studies focused on younger populations and their age distributions were narrower than our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%