The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11250-008-9184-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Brucella abortus antibodies in serum of Holstein cattle in Cameroon

Abstract: Holstein cattle of a small scale dairy production systems were screened for Brucella abortus antibodies in 21 villages in Cameroon by ELISA. Results show a general seroprevalence of 8.4% in Holstein cattle. Of the 192 cows tested, 14 were infected giving a within-sex seroprevalence of 7.3% while 6/74 bulls were infected with a seroprevalence of 8%. There was no evidence (P=0.11) of differences in seroprevalence between age groups although animals above one year and below three years accounted for nearly half o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

8
34
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(5 reference statements)
8
34
2
Order By: Relevance
“…is independent of sex of cattle. Similar findings have also been reported elsewhere (Bayemi et al 2009). However, this relationship has been shown to vary with different cattle subpopulations (Chimana et al 2010;Kubuafor et al 2000;Muma et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…is independent of sex of cattle. Similar findings have also been reported elsewhere (Bayemi et al 2009). However, this relationship has been shown to vary with different cattle subpopulations (Chimana et al 2010;Kubuafor et al 2000;Muma et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…(Nielsen et al 2004). The observed brucellosis seroprevalence results agree with those of previous studies in Zimbabwe (Madsen, 1989;Mohan et al 1996) and those from smallholder farming areas in other regions (Bayemi et al 2009;Ibrahim et al 2010;Karimuribo et al 2007). However, higher brucellosis seroprevalence have been recorded in individual cattle from traditional smallholder herds in other areas (Chimana et al 2010;Faye et al 2005;Muma et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The inexistence of a difference in seroprevalence of different age groups of animals >5years accounted for more than half of the infected animals. This association of age with seropositivity of Brucella infection is consistent with the findings of earlier studies by Bayemi et al (2009). Of the 192 cows studied by the later, 14 were infected giving a within-sex seroprevalence of 7.3% while 6/74 bulls were infected with a seroprevalence of 8%.…”
Section: Effect Of Sex Distribution On Brucella Infection In Cattlesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Similarly findings of 8.4% seroprevalence had been reported in Cameroon by Bayemi et al (2009) where Holstein cattle from small scale dairy production systems were screened for Brucella abortus antibodies in 2 1 villages. Of the 192 cows tested by the later, 14 were infected giving a within-sex seroprevalence of 7.3% while 6/74 bulls were infected with a seroprevalence of 8%.…”
Section: Effect Of Sex Distribution On Brucella Infection In Cattlesupporting
confidence: 70%
“…While, Cadmus et al (2013) determined the prevalence of bovine brucellosis based on RBT and c-ELISA as 31.6% and 15.8%, respectively. Whereas Bayemi et al (2009) conducted a study on Holstein cattle of a small scale dairy production system for Brucella abortus antibodies in Cameroon by ELISA and found a general seroprevalence of 8.4% in Holstein cattle. These differences in seroprevalence of bovine brucellosis might be due to geographical variations, or difference in the animal species (cattle or buffalo) used in study (Ansari et al, 2014;Sachan et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%