2004
DOI: 10.1201/b16981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparing School Leaders for the 21st Century

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
0
8

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
68
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the school administrators' opinions, different criteria should be taken into consideration in school principal appointments. Similar results have been revealed in previous studies, such as "objective criteria on academic careers in educational administration" (Akbaşlı & Balıkçı 2013), "interview score, leadership features, communication skills and individuals' merits" (Özmen & Kömürlü, 2010), "administrator selection exam score and administrative performance score" (Cemaloğlu 2005), "leadership features and predisposition to teamwork" (Çelik 2003), "in-service training" (Ereş 2009), "human relations and fairness" (Gümüşeli 2001), "administrative performance score and innovativeness" (Huber 2005), "leadership features, job seniority and administrative seniority" (Korkmaz 2005) and "academic career in educational administration" (Okçu 2011). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the school administrators' opinions, different criteria should be taken into consideration in school principal appointments. Similar results have been revealed in previous studies, such as "objective criteria on academic careers in educational administration" (Akbaşlı & Balıkçı 2013), "interview score, leadership features, communication skills and individuals' merits" (Özmen & Kömürlü, 2010), "administrator selection exam score and administrative performance score" (Cemaloğlu 2005), "leadership features and predisposition to teamwork" (Çelik 2003), "in-service training" (Ereş 2009), "human relations and fairness" (Gümüşeli 2001), "administrative performance score and innovativeness" (Huber 2005), "leadership features, job seniority and administrative seniority" (Korkmaz 2005) and "academic career in educational administration" (Okçu 2011). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…how two major preoccupations of politicians can be accommodated: on the one hand school level decision-making and strong local involvement in the direction of schools, on the other, some guarantees that the government is ensuring a supply of trained and suitable experienced candidates will be available to manage the stock of schools (Huber andWest, 2002: 1092). While Huber and West examined formal leadership roles, the policy focus now is on building leadership capability on a much broader level.…”
Section: Cohesive Leadership Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Huber and West (2002) in their survey of school leadership development across ten countries (in Australasia, Asia, Europe and USA) compared the degree of centralisation. While in more centralised systems school leadership development was 'standardised, closely monitored, mostly mandatory and national or federal governments maintain close involvement in quality assurance' (Huber andWest, 2002: 1091), in decentralised systems, there was school autonomy and considerable variety of provision in leadership development. A third group was identified where significant school autonomy sat alongside a centralised approach to school leadership development This third group illustrates:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Düzenlenecek okul yöneticisi eğitimlerinde, (hem hedef grubun yetenekleri hem de karşılaştıkları problemlerin çözümü için ihtiyaç duydukları öğrenme ihtiyaçları dikkate alındığında) katılımcı deneyimlerinin eğitimsel süreç için önemli bir kaynak olması; içerik ve yöntemin katılımcıların gereksinim ve ilgilerine göre belirlenmesi ve eğitimin -konu tabanlı değil-problem merkezli olması ve tüm sorumluluğun sadece eğitimci tarafından değil öğrenenin de üstlenmesinin sağlanması önemli hususlardır (Huang, 2002;Huber, 2004;Knowles, Holton ve Swanson, 2005;Kesim, 2009;Altın ve Vatanartıran, 2014). Bu nedenle, düzenlenen programların -örgütsel gelişme ve yönetim alanlarında sıkça kullanılan-yetişkin eğitimi yaklaşımı kapsamında ele alınması gerekmektedir.…”
Section: çAlışmanın Amacıunclassified
“…In the training sessions for the school administrators, it is essential to ensure that the experiences of the participants are an important source for the educational process, to determine the contents and method according to the needs and interests of the participants and to ensure that the education is problem based not topic based and the whole responsibility is taken not only by the educators but also by the learners (Altın & Vatanartıran, 2014;Huang, 2002;Huber, 2004;Kesim, 2009;Knowles, Holton, & Swanson, 2005). Therefore, the scope of adult education should be take into account in training programs which is commonly used in the fields of organizational development and administration.…”
Section: Purpose Of the Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%