2014
DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2014.910137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation and characterisation of PES-ZnO mixed matrix membranes for humic acid removal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results showed that all membranes roughness parameters with the addition of clay were larger than those of the pure PES membrane. Similar results were also reported by different authors [25][26][27][28][29]. By adding the hydrophilic nanoparticles to the casting solution, it was observed that the mixed matrix membranes had high surface roughness in comparison to the pure membranes.…”
Section: Membrane Morphologysupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The results showed that all membranes roughness parameters with the addition of clay were larger than those of the pure PES membrane. Similar results were also reported by different authors [25][26][27][28][29]. By adding the hydrophilic nanoparticles to the casting solution, it was observed that the mixed matrix membranes had high surface roughness in comparison to the pure membranes.…”
Section: Membrane Morphologysupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The increase in HA rejection rates was observed when 1.25 wt% ZnO added in PES membrane (Ahmad et al, 2014). Further, HA flux was also enhanced by incorporation ZnO in PES polymer matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The FRR and RFR values after filtration of 2 mg/mL of BSA solution at pH 7.2 at different applied pressure of the membranes are presented in Figure (a,b). Generally, a high value of FRR and low value of RFR indicates a strong fouling resistance to membrane . According to Figure (a,b), it was found that the membranes with SCER displayed better antifouling properties than controlled membrane with respect to average PWF before and after BSA filtration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The obtained results as shown in Table , clearly indicate that the surface roughness of the fabricated membrane increase with increase in SCER content. It has been reported that membranes with lower surface roughness have stronger antifouling abilities . The fouling capability tends to increase with increase in surface roughness due to accumulation of solute in the node of the rough membrane surface .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation