2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00056-006-0607-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Premolar Root Changes Following Treatment with the Banded Herbst Appliance

Abstract: Although we observed no statistically-significant root morphology changes in the first and second premolars following Herbst appliance treatment, the mandibular first premolars revealed significantly more root resorption than did the mandibular second premolars.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
5
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the first, statistical difference was not found in upper and lower premolars. However, regarding lower premolars, the first premolars showed more resorption than the second premolars 16 . The second study supports that the teeth more affected by the apical root resorption was the upper first molars and the lower first premolars 11 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In the first, statistical difference was not found in upper and lower premolars. However, regarding lower premolars, the first premolars showed more resorption than the second premolars 16 . The second study supports that the teeth more affected by the apical root resorption was the upper first molars and the lower first premolars 11 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Similar effects have been described in the literature. For instance, Nasiopoulos et al [15] found a significant decrease in root surface areas during treatment with Herbst appliances and hence fixed functional appliances on premolars which were loaded with reciprocal forces for anchorage purposes. Teeth which have not yet completed root development do experience continued root lengthening during orthodontic treatment [14] but they do not attain their "normal" root length [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hier könnten die auf die Verankerungseinheit wirkenden Kräfte dazu führen, dass die Wurzeln der ersten Prämolaren des Oberkiefers zwar an Länge zunehmen, aber möglicherweise ihre potentiell mög-liche definitive Länge nicht erreichen. Ähnliche Effekte wurden in der Literatur beschrieben: So stellten Nasiopoulos et al [15] während der Behandlung mit Herbst-Apparaturen und somit für festsitzende funktionskieferorthopädische Geräte an Prämolaren, die zu Verankerungszwecken mit reziprok auftretenden Kräften belastet wurden, eine signifikante Abnahme der Wurzeloberflächen fest. Zähne mit noch nicht abgeschlossener Wurzelentwicklung weisen unter einer kieferorthopädischen Behandlung zwar eine weitere Längenentwicklung der Wurzeln auf [14], erreichen jedoch ihre "normale" Wurzellänge nicht [13].…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
See 2 more Smart Citations