2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary investigation of artificial reef concrete with sulphoaluminate cement, marine sand and sea water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the Chinese standard GB 50010-2010 [28], the compressive strength of each mixture specimen was between C15 and C20. In general, the compressive strength of an artificial reef should be above C30 [3,29] to ensure that it will not break when dropped to the seafloor. To analyze the feasibility of seabed silt as an artificial reef material, the SAR specimens were made only of cement, seabed silt, and pure water, so as to avoid the influence of other materials on the test results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the Chinese standard GB 50010-2010 [28], the compressive strength of each mixture specimen was between C15 and C20. In general, the compressive strength of an artificial reef should be above C30 [3,29] to ensure that it will not break when dropped to the seafloor. To analyze the feasibility of seabed silt as an artificial reef material, the SAR specimens were made only of cement, seabed silt, and pure water, so as to avoid the influence of other materials on the test results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the published literature, despite the substantial efforts devoted to fulfilling the high reinforcing potential of OPC as the reinforced binder (less than 4 wt%) in a CAEM system, the present reports of reinforcing effects (especially for long-term performance) are limited and even somewhat contradictory. Sulfoaluminate cement (SAC), as a new type of cement with anhydrous calcium sulfoaluminate and calcium silicate as the main mineral composition, possesses a higher content of anhydrous calcium sulfoaluminate (~70 wt%) compared with the OPC, which plays a vital role in controlling the mixture strength formation at early age, and has a great potential to improve the other related properties [20][21][22]. Up to date, reports on the effect of high cement content (> 4 wt%) on the performance of CAEM performance are very limited.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expansion of the limestone as the temperature increased varied from 1.00 × 10 -3 to 2.5 × 10 -2 /°C; this was less pronounced than the expansion of the quartz sand, which ranged from 2.4 × 10 -3 to 6.00 × 10 -2 /°C from 100 °C to 300 °C. The rising temperature caused the limestone to grow in size, resulting in the shrinkage of the SAC paste bordering it, due to the imbalance of the thermal stresses between the limestone, quartz, and very dense SAC paste [25,26]. The average mass changes (in grams) of the SACC were 0.119 at 100 °C, 1.302 at 200 °C, and 1.573 at 300 °C; for the SAC paste, they were 0.67 at 100 °C, 2.73 at 200 °C, 3.7 at 300 °C, and 3.71 at 400 °C, relative to the initial mass at 20 °C.…”
Section: Compressive Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%