2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.05.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary assessment of nanopore-based metagenomic sequencing for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wang at al. conducted a preliminary assessment of this technology (46). The authors were able to identify the causative microorganisms of PJI within approximately 12 hours after sample collection.…”
Section: Molecular Diagnostic Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wang at al. conducted a preliminary assessment of this technology (46). The authors were able to identify the causative microorganisms of PJI within approximately 12 hours after sample collection.…”
Section: Molecular Diagnostic Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors were able to identify the causative microorganisms of PJI within approximately 12 hours after sample collection. Furthermore, the detection of corresponding antimicrobial resistance determinants was faster compared to short-read based mNGS (46). NGS performed on cultured microorganisms isolated from a patient experiencing two episodes of PJI within a 9-month period was crucial to understand that the second episode was a new infection with the same bacterial species (47).…”
Section: Molecular Diagnostic Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 60 This technology allows for real-time analysis while sequencing is ongoing, significantly reducing the turnaround time ( Table 2 ). Wang et al 61 compared the classic metagenomic NGS, nanopore-based metagenomic sequencing and classical culture for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections from collected joint fluid, periprosthetic tissue and sonication fluid. Interestingly, the two metagenomic methods showed a similar sensitivity rate but the nanopore-based metagenomic sequencing method showed a better specificity and a quicker turnaround time (14–22 hours).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies [9][10][11][12][13][14][15] have shown metagenomic sequencing can identify causative pathogens in PJI, achieving species-level sensitivity of 83-96%, and potentially identifying difficult to grow organisms and pathogens following prior antibiotics. However, lack of comprehensive antimicrobial susceptibility prediction from orthopaedic metagenomic sequencing has limited its application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%