2020
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2020.580671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precision Medicine in the Diagnosis and Management of Orthopedic Biofilm Infections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Biofilm formation is a multistep process that depends upon bacterial phenotypical characteristics, gene expression, and adhesion proteins present on the surface of bacteria [11,12]. Some MRSA strains having specific genotyping characteristics can form biofilm various infection sites [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biofilm formation is a multistep process that depends upon bacterial phenotypical characteristics, gene expression, and adhesion proteins present on the surface of bacteria [11,12]. Some MRSA strains having specific genotyping characteristics can form biofilm various infection sites [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this connection, it should also be considered that studying the molecular epidemiology of emerging pathogens, such as S. lugdunensis, favors the search for new anti-infective molecules alternative to antibiotics with which to coat or load biomaterials to make them capable of preventing and combating implant infections [36][37][38][39]. And indeed, grasping the clonal complexity promotes the transition to precision medicine, which adapts anti-infective biomaterials to the peculiar pathogenetic context [33][34][35][40][41][42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interest in designing such personalized implants relies on the need to produce safe systems, offering high antibacterial efficacy, improving patient convenience, and providing flexibility according to the patient’s needs. The latter can be achieved by adjusting the implant’s structural and morphological features, mechanical properties, and improving the loading efficacy of antibacterial agents [ 92 , 150 , 151 ].…”
Section: Current Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interest in designing such personalized implants relies on the need to produce safe systems, offering high antibacterial efficacy, improving patient convenience, and providing flexibility according to the patient s needs. The latter can be achieved by adjusting the implant s structural and morphological features, mechanical properties, and improving the loading efficacy of antibacterial agents [92,150,151]. In addition to the recent progress in the development of antibacterial coatings, it is worth highlighting recent advances in the surface design of modified orthopedic implants with antibacterial properties.…”
Section: Current Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%