2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-018-3672-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Preferential” ammonium uptake by sugarcane does not increase the 15N recovery of fertilizer sources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…? as compared to NO 3 - (Boschiero et al 2018), which does not mean that NH 4 ? is beneficial to sugarcane.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…? as compared to NO 3 - (Boschiero et al 2018), which does not mean that NH 4 ? is beneficial to sugarcane.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Among the FM treatments, FM1 contained a higher amount of NH 4 + which is the most needed N form for sugarcane growth. Unlike most other crops, evidence has shown that sugarcane has a preferential uptake of ammonium than other forms of N ( Boschiero, Mariano & Trivelin, 2018 ). Although NH 4 concentration was similar in the CK, FM2, and FM3, the lower TN in CK suggests that higher mineralization of the soil’s native N May have occurred, which may result in inorganic N losses if a lower uptake accompanied by leaching losses occurs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of 15 N labelled fertiliser can trace the fate of fertiliser N in crop and soil and provides information regarding the amount of fertiliser N lost to the environment as the balance between recovered and applied 15 N fertiliser (Dourado-Neto et al 2010). Fertiliser 15 N uptake in sugarcane commonly accounts for only 20-40% of the N applied (Boschiero et al 2018;Chapman et al 1994;da Silva et al 2020;Franco et al 2011;Prasertsak et al 2002;Takeda et al 2021b;Vallis et al 1996), which is lower than values typically reported from other eld crops such as maize (65%), wheat (57%), and rice (46%) (Ladha et al 2005). Subtracting the recovered fertiliser N from the total N in the respective pool enables evaluation of soil N contribution to this N pool.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%