2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-005-0906-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of survival after severe dysphagic stroke

Abstract: Severe dysphagia requiring FGT is common in patients with stroke referred for neurorehabilitation. Patients who had a FGT in place at the time of discharge from the stroke rehabilitation unit or aspirated during VSS were substantially more likely to have died by the time of follow-up compared to those who had had the FGT removed and had no signs of aspiration on VSS. However functional outcome measurements (FIM, FCM) including the cognitive function (attention, concentration etc.) could play an important role … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
39
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the size of the lesion is considered to be more important than its location for the development of oropharyngeal dysphagia (29) . In the present study, the possibility of mortality was found to be higher among patients with swallowing dysfunction, as previously described (16) , generally associated with aspirative pneumonia. Patients with dysphagia after a stroke are at a 6-to 7-fold higher risk to develop aspirative pneumonia and at a 3-fold higher risk to die (42) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, the size of the lesion is considered to be more important than its location for the development of oropharyngeal dysphagia (29) . In the present study, the possibility of mortality was found to be higher among patients with swallowing dysfunction, as previously described (16) , generally associated with aspirative pneumonia. Patients with dysphagia after a stroke are at a 6-to 7-fold higher risk to develop aspirative pneumonia and at a 3-fold higher risk to die (42) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…These values refer to clinical evaluation since no objective exam was used, which might have revealed silent aspirations not detected by clinical evaluation. Although the sensitivity and specificity of this evaluation is variable (43) , with no detection of silent aspiration, its reliability has been widely reported (32) , as well as its contribution to the diagnosis, planning during the objective exam and the definition of therapy (1,16) . There are some published protocols to evaluate the intensity of dysphagia (4,30,(38)(39)(40) , but there is no perfect agreement between them (41) , which indicates the need to discuss the importance of the protocols used to evaluate oropharyngeal dysphagia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The severity of the cases has an influence on the following procedures and determines variations on the others indicators. For example, determining the functional outcomes associated with cognitive measurements can play an important role in predicting and treating swallowing as well as improving survival during neurorehabilitation (13) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are mainly neurological such as stroke or cerebrovascular accident, brain injury from trauma or bleeding, degenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease, neuromuscular disorders such as Parkinson's disease or mechanical such as cancer, oral trauma and/or surgery, craniofacial abnormalities (Ney et al 2009;Speech Pathology Australia 2004). Of these stroke is estimated to be the most common cause of dysphagia (Ickenstein et al 2005). Stroke is also the leading cause of long-term disability in Australian adults, and represents 25% of all chronic disability (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2003).…”
Section: Dysphagiamentioning
confidence: 99%