2013
DOI: 10.1002/berj.3104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of numeracy performance in national testing programs: insights from the longitudinal study of Australian children

Abstract: This article is based on an exploratory study that examines factors which predict children's performance on the numeracy component of the Australian National Assessment ProgramLiteracy and Numeracy (NAPLAN). Utilizing an ecological theoretical model, this study examines child, home and school variables which may enable or constrain NAPLAN numeracy performance. Data are presented from a nationally-representative sample of 2450 children participating in the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (LSAC). Twent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reasons for exclusion were the children were neither preschool nor kindergarten age (e.g., Carmichael et al 2014;Dearing et al 2012), the data for younger children were not reported separately from that of older study participants (e.g., LeFevre et al 2009), no home or family numeracy experiences measure was used in the studies (e.g., Aunio and Niemivirta 2010;Kluczniok et al 2013), incomplete correlations among measures were reported (e.g., Skwarchuk 2009), or the data were not reported in a format necessary to ascertain the relationships between early numeracy experiences and child mathematics performance (e.g., Anders et al 2012;Galindo and Sheldon 2012). Searches for other research reports on the excluded studies to identify data in the formats necessary to include in the research synthesis proved unsuccessful.…”
Section: Search Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for exclusion were the children were neither preschool nor kindergarten age (e.g., Carmichael et al 2014;Dearing et al 2012), the data for younger children were not reported separately from that of older study participants (e.g., LeFevre et al 2009), no home or family numeracy experiences measure was used in the studies (e.g., Aunio and Niemivirta 2010;Kluczniok et al 2013), incomplete correlations among measures were reported (e.g., Skwarchuk 2009), or the data were not reported in a format necessary to ascertain the relationships between early numeracy experiences and child mathematics performance (e.g., Anders et al 2012;Galindo and Sheldon 2012). Searches for other research reports on the excluded studies to identify data in the formats necessary to include in the research synthesis proved unsuccessful.…”
Section: Search Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies observed the result of the often binary (pass/fail) nature of the dependent variable. In addition, some of the studies employed linear regression (Snowling, Hulme, Bailey, Stothard & Lindsay, 2014;Carmichael, MacDonald & McFarland-Piazza, 2014;Lane & Murray, 2015) and mixed effects regression (Purpura, Hume, Sims, & Lonigan, 2011). This paper will focus on binary logistic regression within the context of teacher efficacy.…”
Section: Literacy and Numeracy In Malaysiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, early childhood mathematics is in the international spotlight. Partly this is the result of a myriad of studies that seem to show that early childhood mathematics achievement is a strong predictor of success or otherwise in future school mathematics, other school subjects and life itself (Duncan et al 2007;Geary et al 2013;Carmichael, MacDonald, and McFarland-Piazza 2014). As a result, across the globe, there is greater encouragement for early childhood professionals in both prior-to-school and school settings to engage with their children in mathematics learning, with one aim being to ensure that the children's standards of achievement are higher by the time they meet the first national or international assessment of their careers.…”
Section: Innovative Approaches In Early Childhood Mathematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%