2012
DOI: 10.1007/s12205-012-1651-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of ultimate bearing capacity of shallow foundations on cohesionless soils: An evolutionary approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ANN and fuzzy inference models. Similarly, Shahnazari and Tutunchian (2012) developed another GP model for predicting the ultimate capacity of shallow foundations on cohesionless soils. In this case, the GP model was calibrated and validated using an experimental database consisting of 100 load tests.…”
Section: Shahin Artificial Intelligence Applications In Shallow Foundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ANN and fuzzy inference models. Similarly, Shahnazari and Tutunchian (2012) developed another GP model for predicting the ultimate capacity of shallow foundations on cohesionless soils. In this case, the GP model was calibrated and validated using an experimental database consisting of 100 load tests.…”
Section: Shahin Artificial Intelligence Applications In Shallow Foundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, ANNs have been used for shallow foundations including settlement estimation (Chen et al, 2009;Shahin et al, 2002bShahin et al, , 2003Sivakugan et al, 1998;Soleimanbeigi and Hataf, 2006) and prediction of ultimate bearing capacity (Behera et al, 2013a(Behera et al, , 2013bKalinli et al, 2011;Kuo et al, 2009;Padmini et al, 2008;Provenzano et al, 2004;Soleimanbeigi and Hataf, 2005). Likewise, GP and EPR have been investigated for settlement prediction of shallow foundations (Rezania and Javadi, 2007;Shahin, 2014;Shahnazari et al, 2014) as well as ultimate bearing capacity (Adarsh et al, 2012;Pan et al, 2013;Shahin, 2014;Shahnazari and Tutunchian, 2012;Tsai et al, 2013). The objective of this paper is to provide an overview of some of the popular AI techniques, present a review of the AI applications to date in shallow foundations, and discuss some of the current challenges and future directions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have leveraged ML models like artificial neural networks (ANNs), support vector machines (SVMs), evolutionary polynomial regression (EPR), neuro-fuzzy systems, and hybrid ANNs to predict the settlement of unreinforced soil foundations [27][28][29][30][31][32]. However, the research related to the application of ML techniques in RSFs is very limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different forms of AI-based techniques have recently been used by different researchers to address the UBC problem of shallow foundations. Artificial neural networks (ANNs), fuzzy inference systems (FISs), adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems (ANFISs), ant colony optimization (ACO), genetic programming (GP), weighted genetic programming (WGP), soft-computing polynomials (SCP), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and relevance vector machine (RVM) have all been used to successfully estimate the UBC of shallow foundations on soil [11,[22][23][24][25][26]. Soft computing methodologies are more accurate than analytical formulas, according to all of these studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%