2021
DOI: 10.3390/app112110317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations on Cohesionless Soils: A Gaussian Process Regression Approach

Abstract: This study examines the potential of the soft computing technique—namely, Gaussian process regression (GPR), to predict the ultimate bearing capacity (UBC) of cohesionless soils beneath shallow foundations. The inputs of the model are width of footing (B), depth of footing (D), footing geometry (L/B), unit weight of sand (γ), and internal friction angle (ϕ). The results of the present model were compared with those obtained by two theoretical approaches reported in the literature. The statistical evaluation of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Pham et al [38] used 60%; Liang et al [23] used 70%; while Ahmad et al [28] used 80% of the data for training. The statistical consistency of training and testing datasets has a substantial impact on the results when using soft computing techniques which improves the performance of the model and helps in evaluating them better [22,46]. To choose the most consistent representation, statistical studies of input and output variables of the training and testing data were performed.…”
Section: Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For instance, Pham et al [38] used 60%; Liang et al [23] used 70%; while Ahmad et al [28] used 80% of the data for training. The statistical consistency of training and testing datasets has a substantial impact on the results when using soft computing techniques which improves the performance of the model and helps in evaluating them better [22,46]. To choose the most consistent representation, statistical studies of input and output variables of the training and testing data were performed.…”
Section: Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R 2 is a number that ranges from 0 to 1, a higher R 2 value indicates a more efficient model. The model is considered effective when R 2 is more than 0.8 and close to 1 [22]. The mean squared difference between projected outputs and targets is the criterion RMSE, and the mean magnitude of errors is the criterion MAE, RMSE and MAE are similar in that the closer these criterion values of these errors are to 0, the better the model's performance.…”
Section: Model Evaluation Indexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This enables the evaluation of non-linear correlations between any of the soil and foundation characteristics, as well as provides faster and more accurate results than earlier techniques. ANNs have recently been used to solve a variety of geotechnical engineering applications such as bearing capacity estimation [6,7], rock burst hazard prediction in underground projects [8], slope stability evaluation [9][10][11], concrete compressive strength prediction [12], and estimation of rock modulus [13]. This suggests that ANNs can be utilized for forecasting as well as prediction of events by simulating exceedingly complex functions [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%