2004
DOI: 10.1243/095440604774202295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of spring-back in anisotropic sheet metals

Abstract: Constitutive equations for plane stress problems based on the modi ed form of a nonquadratic yield criterion suitable for aluminium alloy sheet were derived by Barlat et al. to account for the Bauschinger effect (BE). N umerical predictions of spring-back based on the original yield function and its modi ed form were performed and compared with the results of draw-bending tests. The results show the necessity of including the BE in the constitutive equations to enhance the accuracy in predicting spring-back.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nguyen et al. 1,25,26 reported the results for specimens oriented in the rolling direction. It was found that the modified YLD96, when combined with the mixed hardening (MH) model using two nonlinear components and one linear component of back stress, i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Nguyen et al. 1,25,26 reported the results for specimens oriented in the rolling direction. It was found that the modified YLD96, when combined with the mixed hardening (MH) model using two nonlinear components and one linear component of back stress, i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of the draw-bend test and simulation of these tests using the explicit finite element code DYNA3D have previously been described by Nguyen et al. 1,25,26…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some reports go further, with specific recommendations for small N IP : 7 IP for minimizing sensitivity (Yao et al, 2002), 9 IP for accuracy (Nguyen et al, 2004), and 7 IP for more accurate answers than 3, 5 or 11 (Xu et al, 2004). A default value for N IP of 5 appears in shell elements for some commercial software: Abaqus (Abaqus, 2005) and Pam-Stamp (Zhang, 2005), whereas N IP of 9 is recommended for accuracy with LS-Dyna (Nguyen et al, 2004). These references, taken together, imply that N IP is not a critical numerical parameter in springback simulation, at least for N IP greater than about 5.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%