2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2006.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of springback: Through-thickness integration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
48
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In summary, five integration points are the minimum acceptable, considering the computation time and accurateness of springback prediction. The Gauss' rule with five integration points gives better prediction of the springback coefficient, which is in good agreement with the results of Burgoyne and Crisfield [35] and Wagoner and Lee [26]. In the case of Gauss quadrature, an increase of the number of integration points from five to 15 decreases the springback prediction error at 0.24%.…”
Section: Effect Of the Number Of Integration Pointssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In summary, five integration points are the minimum acceptable, considering the computation time and accurateness of springback prediction. The Gauss' rule with five integration points gives better prediction of the springback coefficient, which is in good agreement with the results of Burgoyne and Crisfield [35] and Wagoner and Lee [26]. In the case of Gauss quadrature, an increase of the number of integration points from five to 15 decreases the springback prediction error at 0.24%.…”
Section: Effect Of the Number Of Integration Pointssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In the case of non-linear analysis, five integration points are sufficient to provide accurate results [24], while Xu et al [25] concluded that usually seven integration points are sufficient. On the contrary, Wagoner and Li [26] found that to analyse the springback with 1% computational error, up to 51 points are required for shell type elements. Thus, as noticed by Banabic [27], the choice of a number of integration points is still an open issue in the simulation of springback.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in literature the recommended number of integration point layers for springback simulations varies greatly. Li et al (2002), and Wagoner and Li (2007) recommended 15-25 points depending on sheet tension and bending radius. Others found five or seven integration point layers sufficient, cf.…”
Section: Forming Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More relevant of these to CAF are friction condition, thermally-induced distortions and design of tooling (Yang et al, 2013). The use of finite element method further introduces numerical sensitivity to the problem in the form of numerical scheme, mesh density, element type and the number of through-thickness integration points in shell elements, to name but a few (Narasimhan and Lovell, 1999;Wagoner and Li, 2007;Wagoner et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%